Shanker Anil, Brooks Alan David, Tristan Carlos Alberto, Wine John William, Elliott Peter John, Yagita Hideo, Takeda Kazuyoshi, Smyth Mark John, Murphy William Joseph, Sayers Thomas Joseph
Laboratory of Experimental Immunology, Cancer and Inflammation Program, SAIC-Frederick, Inc, National Cancer Institute-Frederick, Frederick, MD 21702, USA.
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008 May 7;100(9):649-62. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djn113. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
Resistance of tumors to cell death signals poses a complex clinical problem. We explored the therapeutic potential and in vivo toxicity of a combination of bortezomib, a proteasome inhibitor, and MD5-1, a tumor necrosis factor-related apoptosis-inducing ligand (TRAIL) receptor (DR5) agonist monoclonal antibody, in mouse carcinomas. METHODS; Mice bearing Renca-FLAG (renal) or 4T1 (mammary) tumors were treated with bortezomib and/or MD5-1 and examined for lung metastases (Renca-FLAG: n = 93; 4T1: n = 40) or monitored for survival (Renca-FLAG: n = 143). Toxicity was assessed by histopathology and hematology. Viability and apoptotic signaling in Renca-FLAG and 4T1 cells treated with bortezomib alone or in combination with TRAIL were analyzed using 3-[4,5-dimethyiazol-2-yl-5]-[3-carboxymethyloxyphenyl]-2-[4-sulfophenyl]-2H tetrazolium assay and by measuring mitochondrial membrane depolarization and caspase-8 and caspase-3 activation. All statistical tests were two-sided.
Bortezomib (20 nM) sensitized Renca-FLAG and 4T1 cells to TRAIL-mediated apoptosis (mean percent decrease in numbers of viable cells, bortezomib + TRAIL vs TRAIL: Renca-FLAG, 95% vs 34%, difference = 61%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 52% to 69%, P < .001; 4T1, 85% vs 20%, difference = 65%, 95% CI = 62% to 69%, P < .001). Sensitization involved activation of caspase-8 and caspase-3 but not mitochondrial membrane depolarization, suggesting an amplified signaling of the extrinsic cell death pathway. Treatment with bortezomib and MD5-1 reduced lung metastases in mice carrying Renca and 4T1 tumors (mean number of metastases, bortezomib + MD5-1 vs MD5-1: Renca-FLAG, 1 vs 8, difference = 7, 95% CI = 5 to 9, P < .001; 4T1, 1 vs 12, difference = 11, 95% CI = 9 to 12, P < .001) and increased median survival of mice bearing Renca-FLAG tumors (bortezomib + MD5-1 vs bortezomib + control isotype antibody: 22 of 30 [73%] were still alive at day 180 vs median survival of 42 days [95% CI = 41 to 44 days, P < .001]) in the absence of obvious toxicity.
Bortezomib combined with DR5 agonist monoclonal antibody may be a useful treatment for metastatic solid tumors.
肿瘤对细胞死亡信号的抵抗构成了一个复杂的临床问题。我们探讨了蛋白酶体抑制剂硼替佐米与肿瘤坏死因子相关凋亡诱导配体(TRAIL)受体(DR5)激动剂单克隆抗体MD5-1联合应用于小鼠癌的治疗潜力及体内毒性。方法:对携带Renca-FLAG(肾)或4T1(乳腺)肿瘤的小鼠用硼替佐米和/或MD5-1进行治疗,并检测肺转移情况(Renca-FLAG:n = 93;4T1:n = 40)或监测生存期(Renca-FLAG:n = 143)。通过组织病理学和血液学评估毒性。使用3-[4,5-二甲基噻唑-2-基-5]-[3-羧甲基氧基苯基]-2-[4-磺基苯基]-2H四唑测定法,并通过测量线粒体膜去极化以及半胱天冬酶-8和半胱天冬酶-3的激活,分析单独使用硼替佐米或与TRAIL联合使用时对Renca-FLAG和4T1细胞活力及凋亡信号的影响。所有统计检验均为双侧检验。
硼替佐米(20 nM)使Renca-FLAG和4T1细胞对TRAIL介导的凋亡敏感(存活细胞数量的平均减少百分比,硼替佐米+TRAIL与TRAIL相比:Renca-FLAG,95%对34%,差异=61%,95%置信区间[CI]=52%至69%,P<.001;4T1,85%对20%,差异=65%,95%CI=62%至69%,P<.001)。致敏涉及半胱天冬酶-8和半胱天冬酶-3的激活,但不涉及线粒体膜去极化,提示外源性细胞死亡途径的信号放大。用硼替佐米和MD5-1治疗可减少携带Renca和4T1肿瘤小鼠的肺转移(转移灶平均数量,硼替佐米+MD5-1与MD5-1相比:Renca-FLAG,1对8,差异=7,95%CI=5至9,P<.001;4T1,1对12,差异=11,95%CI=9至12,P<.001),并增加携带Renca-FLAG肿瘤小鼠的中位生存期(硼替佐米+MD5-1与硼替佐米+对照同种型抗体相比:30只中有22只[73%]在第180天仍存活,而中位生存期为42天[95%CI=41至44天,P<.001]),且无明显毒性。
硼替佐米与DR5激动剂单克隆抗体联合应用可能是转移性实体瘤的一种有效治疗方法。