Suppr超能文献

正式的验证性分析不适用于临床研究的情况。

Situations where formal confirmatory analysis is inappropriate for clinical research.

作者信息

Salsburg D

机构信息

Pfizer Central Research, Groton, Connecticut 06340.

出版信息

J Biopharm Stat. 1991;1(1):121-32. doi: 10.1080/10543409108835009.

Abstract

When new drugs are developed for indications where no effective therapies have been established, such as emphysema, useful measures of clinical activity have to be derived from a large number of proposed measures. It often happens that most of the proposed measures are of little use in tracking the disease and that the numbers of patients needed to establish whether the drug is effective is very large. Thus, the first study in man may be the size of the usual Phase III "confirmatory" study, and the expense and the time needed to complete it are so great that decisions about the future development of the drug will depend upon this one large study. The situation of such innovative therapies is examined, and methods for controlling the error rate when almost all analyses have to be exploratory are proposed.

摘要

当针对诸如肺气肿等尚无有效治疗方法的适应症研发新药时,必须从大量提议的测量指标中得出有用的临床活性测量方法。通常情况下,大多数提议的测量指标在追踪疾病方面用处不大,而且确定药物是否有效所需的患者数量非常多。因此,人体首次研究可能具有常规III期“确证性”研究的规模,完成该研究所需的费用和时间非常高,以至于关于药物未来研发的决策将取决于这一项大型研究。本文审视了此类创新疗法的情况,并提出了在几乎所有分析都必须是探索性分析时控制错误率的方法。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验