Maciejewski Stephanie, Hilleman Daniel
Cardiac Center of Creighton University, Omaha, Nebraska, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 May;28(5):570-5. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.5.570.
To compare the effectiveness of a fenofibrate 145-mg nanoparticle tablet formulation with the standard 160-mg tablet in patients with dyslipidemia and coronary heart disease.
Retrospective medical record review.
Outpatient university-affiliated cardiology clinic.
One hundred thirty patients with dyslipidemia and coronary heart disease treated for a minimum of 6 months with fenofibrate 160 mg/day (with or without 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor [statin] therapy) who were then switched to a minimum of 3 months of treatment with fenofibrate 145 mg/day.
Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), and triglyceride levels were compared during treatment with each formulation. In patients not taking statins, statistically significant reductions of 4.6% and 2.3%, respectively, were noted in mean triglyceride and LDL levels after the switch to fenofibrate 145 mg/day. In patients taking statins, statistically significant reductions of 5.1% and 2.8%, respectively, were observed in mean triglyceride and LDL levels. In total, a larger proportion of patients had 10% or greater improvement in LDL (14/130 [11%]) and triglyceride (32/130 [25%]) levels compared with the proportion of patients who had 10% or greater worsening in LDL (3/130 [2%]) and triglyceride (9/130 [7%]) levels, and a net additional 14 patients (11%) achieved National Cholesterol Education Program (NCEP) lipid panel targets after the switch to fenofibrate 145 mg/day. Mean HDL level was not significantly different after the switch to fenofibrate 145 mg/day. Safety parameters of fenofibrate 145-mg/day therapy were not examined, although fenofibrate 160 mg/day is generally well tolerated.
Eleven percent of the patients in our study had improvements in their lipid profiles that resulted in achievement of NCEP lipid panel targets after treatment with the 145-mg nanoparticle formulation of fenofibrate. This improvement in lipid levels may have been related to increased bioavailability of the 145-mg formulation. However, the exact mechanism of the improvement in lipid levels is unknown.
比较非诺贝特145毫克纳米颗粒片剂配方与标准160毫克片剂对血脂异常和冠心病患者的疗效。
回顾性病历审查。
大学附属医院门诊心脏病诊所。
130例血脂异常和冠心病患者,接受至少6个月的非诺贝特160毫克/天治疗(联合或不联合3-羟基-3-甲基戊二酰辅酶A还原酶抑制剂[他汀类药物]治疗),随后转为至少3个月的非诺贝特145毫克/天治疗。
比较每种配方治疗期间的低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDL)和甘油三酯水平。在未服用他汀类药物的患者中,转为非诺贝特145毫克/天后,平均甘油三酯和LDL水平分别有4.6%和2.3%的显著降低。在服用他汀类药物的患者中,平均甘油三酯和LDL水平分别有5.1%和2.8%的显著降低。总体而言,与LDL(3/130[2%])和甘油三酯(9/130[7%])水平恶化10%或更多的患者比例相比,LDL(14/130[11%])和甘油三酯(32/130[25%])水平改善10%或更多的患者比例更高,转为非诺贝特145毫克/天后,又有14名患者(11%)达到了美国国家胆固醇教育计划(NCEP)血脂指标目标。转为非诺贝特145毫克/天后,平均HDL水平无显著差异。虽然非诺贝特160毫克/天一般耐受性良好,但未对非诺贝特145毫克/天治疗的安全性参数进行检查。
在我们的研究中,11%的患者在使用145毫克非诺贝特纳米颗粒配方治疗后,血脂谱得到改善,达到了NCEP血脂指标目标。血脂水平的这种改善可能与145毫克配方生物利用度的提高有关。然而,血脂水平改善的确切机制尚不清楚。