Lam Simon W, Bauer Seth R, Cha Stephen S, Oyen Lance J
Department of Pharmacy, New York-Presbyterian Hospital, Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, USA.
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 May;28(5):591-9. doi: 10.1592/phco.28.5.591.
To determine whether body mass alters the effectiveness of a fixed-dose infusion of arginine vasopressin.
Retrospective medical record review.
All intensive care units of a tertiary medical center.
Sixty-six mechanically ventilated patients who received a fixed-dose intravenous infusion of arginine vasopressin at 0.04 U/minute as the sole agent for hemodynamic support during septic shock.
Patients were divided into four groups on the basis of body mass index. Effectiveness was measured as hemodynamic stability, which was defined as the proportion of patients achieving a mean arterial pressure (MAP) of 65 mm Hg or higher, the magnitude of the change in MAP at 1 hour, and the need for additional rescue vasopressors. Secondary outcomes included mortality and length of stay. Baseline characteristics of all four groups were comparable for age, sex, and severity of illness determined by using Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II (APACHE II), Simplified Acute Physiology II (SAPS II), and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores. The only significant differences in baseline characteristics among the groups were in their central venous pressures. The four groups similarly achieved hemodynamic stability at 1 hour after the administration of arginine vasopressin (p=0.41). We observed no significant differences among groups in the magnitude of MAP change (p=0.62), need for rescue catecholamine vasopressors (p=0.17), 28-day mortality rates (p=0.31), or length of stay in the intensive care unit (p=0.43).
Body mass index did not alter the effects of arginine vasopressin on hemodynamic stability or changes in MAP when the drug was administered as a fixed-dose infusion of 0.04 U/minute. Our results do not support weight-based dosing of vasopressin, unlike the dosing for catecholamine vasopressors.
确定体重是否会改变固定剂量输注精氨酸加压素的疗效。
回顾性病历审查。
一家三级医疗中心的所有重症监护病房。
66例机械通气患者,在感染性休克期间接受以0.04 U/分钟的固定剂量静脉输注精氨酸加压素作为血流动力学支持的唯一药物。
根据体重指数将患者分为四组。疗效以血流动力学稳定性来衡量,血流动力学稳定性定义为达到平均动脉压(MAP)65 mmHg或更高的患者比例、1小时时MAP的变化幅度以及是否需要额外的抢救血管升压药。次要结局包括死亡率和住院时间。根据急性生理学与慢性健康状况评估II(APACHE II)、简化急性生理学II(SAPS II)和序贯器官衰竭评估(SOFA)评分确定,四组患者的年龄、性别和疾病严重程度的基线特征具有可比性。各组之间基线特征的唯一显著差异在于中心静脉压。四组在输注精氨酸加压素后1小时同样实现了血流动力学稳定(p = 0.41)。我们观察到各组之间在MAP变化幅度(p = 0.62)、是否需要抢救儿茶酚胺类血管升压药(p = 0.17)、28天死亡率(p = 0.31)或重症监护病房住院时间(p = 0.43)方面无显著差异。
当以0.04 U/分钟的固定剂量输注给药时,体重指数不会改变精氨酸加压素对血流动力学稳定性或MAP变化的影响。与儿茶酚胺类血管升压药的给药方式不同,我们的结果不支持基于体重的加压素给药方案。