Bickle John
Department of Philosophy and Neuroscience Graduate Program, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45221-0374, USA.
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Jun;17(2):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2008.03.015. Epub 2008 Apr 29.
Social cognition, cognitive neuroscience, and neuroethics have reached a synthesis of late, but some troubling features are present. The neuroscience that currently dominates the study of social cognition is exclusively cognitive neuroscience, as contrasted with the cellular and increasingly molecular emphasis that has gripped mainstream neuroscience over the past three decades. Furthermore, the recent field of molecular and cellular cognition has begun to unravel some molecular mechanisms involved in social cognition, especially pertaining to the consolidation of memories of particular conspecific organisms. Some new experimental techniques for positive interventions into these hypothesized mechanisms offer opportunities for establishing direct causal linkages between intra-neuronal molecular events and the behaviors used to measure social cognitive phenomena. Predicted results from an experiment described below also cast doubt on the application of the "extended mind" approach from recent cognitive science to ground the neuroscience of social cognition. Since neuroethics relies heavily on our best neuroscience of social cognition, that field may soon need to extend its attention beyond cognitive neuroscience, and into neuroscience's cellular and molecular mainstream.
社会认知、认知神经科学和神经伦理学最近已达成一种综合,但仍存在一些令人不安的特征。当前主导社会认知研究的神经科学完全是认知神经科学,这与过去三十年来主导主流神经科学的细胞层面以及日益强调的分子层面的研究重点形成对比。此外,最近的分子与细胞认知领域已开始揭示一些涉及社会认知的分子机制,特别是与特定同种生物记忆巩固相关的机制。一些针对这些假设机制进行积极干预的新实验技术,为在神经元内分子事件与用于测量社会认知现象的行为之间建立直接因果联系提供了机会。下面所描述实验的预测结果也对近期认知科学中“具身认知”方法在社会认知神经科学中的应用提出了质疑。由于神经伦理学在很大程度上依赖于我们关于社会认知的最佳神经科学研究,该领域可能很快需要将其关注范围从认知神经科学扩展到神经科学的细胞和分子主流领域。