Jonkisz Jakub
Institute of Sociology, Department of Management, University of Bielsko-Biała Bielsko-Biała, Poland.
Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 29;6:1035. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01035. eCollection 2015.
Within theoretical and empirical enquiries, many different meanings associated with consciousness have appeared, leaving the term itself quite vague. This makes formulating an abstract and unifying version of the concept of consciousness - the main aim of this article -into an urgent theoretical imperative. It is argued that consciousness, characterized as dually accessible (cognized from the inside and the outside), hierarchically referential (semantically ordered), bodily determined (embedded in the working structures of an organism or conscious system), and useful in action (pragmatically functional), is a graded rather than an all-or-none phenomenon. A gradational approach, however, despite its explanatory advantages, can lead to some counterintuitive consequences and theoretical problems. In most such conceptions consciousness is extended globally (attached to primitive organisms or artificial systems), but also locally (connected to certain lower-level neuronal and bodily processes). For example, according to information integration theory (as introduced recently by Tononi and Koch, 2014), even such simple artificial systems as photodiodes possess miniscule amounts of consciousness. The major challenge for this article, then, is to establish reasonable, empirically justified constraints on how extended the range of a graded consciousness could be. It is argued that conscious systems are limited globally by the ability to individuate information (where individuated information is understood as evolutionarily embedded, socially altered, and private), whereas local limitations should be determined on the basis of a hypothesis about the action-oriented nature of the processes that select states of consciousness. Using these constraints, an abstract concept of consciousness is arrived at, hopefully contributing to a more unified state of play within consciousness studies itself.
在理论和实证研究中,出现了许多与意识相关的不同含义,这使得“意识”这个术语本身相当模糊。这使得制定一个抽象且统一的意识概念版本——本文的主要目标——成为一项紧迫的理论要务。有人认为,意识具有双重可及性(从内部和外部均可认知)、层级指涉性(语义有序)、身体决定性(嵌入生物体或意识系统的工作结构中)以及行动实用性(具有实用功能),它是一种渐变而非全有或全无的现象。然而,渐变方法尽管具有解释优势,但可能会导致一些违反直觉的后果和理论问题。在大多数此类概念中,意识在全球范围内被扩展(附着于原始生物体或人工系统),但也在局部被扩展(与某些较低层次的神经元和身体过程相联系)。例如,根据信息整合理论(如托诺尼和科赫在2014年最近提出的),即使是像光电二极管这样简单的人工系统也拥有微量的意识。那么,本文面临的主要挑战是为渐变意识的范围扩展确立合理的、有实证依据的限制。有人认为,意识系统在全球范围内受到信息个体化能力的限制(其中个体化信息被理解为在进化中嵌入、在社会中改变且具有私密性),而局部限制应基于关于选择意识状态的过程的行动导向性质的假设来确定。利用这些限制,得出了一个抽象的意识概念,有望为意识研究自身更统一的局面做出贡献。