• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用复述范式评估书面语言的微观结构。

Assessing the microstructure of written language using a retelling paradigm.

作者信息

Puranik Cynthia S, Lombardino Linda J, Altmann Lori J P

机构信息

Florida Center for Reading Research, 227 N. Bronough Street, Suite 7250, Tallahassee, FL 32301, USA.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 May;17(2):107-20. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/012).

DOI:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/012)
PMID:18448599
Abstract

PURPOSE

The primary goal of this study was to document the progression of the microstructural elements of written language in children at 4 grade levels. The secondary purpose was to ascertain whether the variables selected for examination could be classified into valid categories that reflect the multidimensional nature of writing.

METHOD

Written language samples were collected and transcribed from 120 children in Grades 3 through 6 using an expository text-retelling paradigm. Nine variables at various levels of language were analyzed.

RESULTS

Using a text-retelling paradigm, measures of productivity (e.g., total number of words and ideas) improved steadily with age, whereas measures of complexity (e.g., mean length of T-unit) did not. Results for measures of accuracy (e.g., spelling and writing conventions) were mixed, with some showing improvement across grades. Grade 3 students showed consistently poorer performance than students in Grades 4, 5, and 6. Grade 4 students showed poorer performance than students in Grades 5 and 6. Exploratory factor analysis suggests that writing can be represented by 3 factors: Productivity, Complexity, and Accuracy.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians can use this multidimensional scheme for examining writing skills using text-retelling formats with children from Grades 3 through 6. This empirically based framework for measuring microstructural variables of writing provides clinicians with a 3-prong conceptual framework for determining children's strengths and weaknesses within the translational stage of writing.

摘要

目的

本研究的主要目标是记录四个年级儿童书面语言微观结构要素的发展进程。次要目的是确定所选择用于考察的变量是否能够被归类为反映写作多维度性质的有效类别。

方法

采用说明文复述范式,收集并转录了120名三年级至六年级儿童的书面语言样本。对九个不同语言层次的变量进行了分析。

结果

采用复述范式,产出量指标(如单词和想法的总数)随年龄稳步提高,而复杂性指标(如T单位的平均长度)则不然。准确性指标(如拼写和书写规范)的结果参差不齐,有些指标显示出各年级间的进步。三年级学生的表现始终比四年级、五年级和六年级的学生差。四年级学生的表现比五年级和六年级的学生差。探索性因素分析表明,写作可以由三个因素来表征:产出量、复杂性和准确性。

结论

临床医生可以使用这种多维度方案,通过复述形式来考察三年级至六年级儿童的写作技能。这个基于实证的测量写作微观结构变量的框架为临床医生提供了一个三管齐下的概念框架,用于确定儿童在写作转换阶段的优势和劣势。

相似文献

1
Assessing the microstructure of written language using a retelling paradigm.使用复述范式评估书面语言的微观结构。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 May;17(2):107-20. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/012).
2
Linguistic Feature Development Across Grades and Genre in Elementary Writing.小学写作中跨年级和体裁的语言特征发展
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2015 Jul;46(3):242-55. doi: 10.1044/2015_LSHSS-14-0043.
3
Spoken expository discourse of children and adolescents: retelling versus generation.儿童和青少年的口语说明文话语:复述与生成
Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Sep;27(9):720-34. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.802016. Epub 2013 Jul 2.
4
Learning to read and spell in Persian: a cross-sectional study from Grades 1 to 4.学习阅读和拼写波斯语:一项从 1 年级到 4 年级的横断面研究。
Dev Psychol. 2010 Nov;46(6):1514-27. doi: 10.1037/a0020377.
5
Comparison of narrative and expository writing in students with and without language-learning disabilities.有无语言学习障碍学生的叙述性和说明性写作比较。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2012 Oct;43(4):395-409. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2012/11-0018). Epub 2012 Mar 12.
6
Oral narrative context effects on poor readers' spoken language performance: story retelling, story generation, and personal narratives.口头叙述语境对阅读能力较差者口语表现的影响:故事复述、故事创作及个人叙述
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Apr;12(2):132-41. doi: 10.3109/17549500903414440.
7
The integration of lexical, syntactic, and discourse features in bilingual adolescents' writing: an exploratory approach.双语青少年写作中的词汇、句法和语篇特征的整合:一种探索性方法。
Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2011 Oct;42(4):491-505. doi: 10.1044/0161-1461(2011/10-0063).
8
Written expression of students with and without learning disabilities: differences across the grades.
J Learn Disabil. 1989 Nov;22(9):561-7, 572. doi: 10.1177/002221948902200908.
9
Mastering inflectional suffixes: a longitudinal study of beginning writers' spellings*.掌握屈折后缀:对初写者拼写的纵向研究*
J Child Lang. 2011 Jun;38(3):533-53. doi: 10.1017/S030500091000022X. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
10
Written narrative characteristics in adults with language impairment.语言障碍成年人的书面叙事特征。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012 Apr;55(2):409-20. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2011/10-0295). Epub 2012 Jan 3.

引用本文的文献

1
Understanding the pathways to text generation: A longitudinal study on executive functions, oral language, and transcription skills from kindergarten to first grade.理解文本生成的途径:一项关于从幼儿园到一年级的执行功能、口语和转录技能的纵向研究。
PLoS One. 2024 Dec 27;19(12):e0315748. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315748. eCollection 2024.
2
The influence of the literacy environment on children's writing development in Chinese.读写环境对儿童中文写作发展的影响。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 13;13:1010471. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1010471. eCollection 2022.
3
Expanding the Direct and Indirect Effects Model of Writing (DIEW): Reading-Writing Relations, and Dynamic Relations As a Function of Measurement/Dimensions of Written Composition.
扩展写作的直接和间接效应模型(DIEW):读写关系以及作为书面作文测量/维度函数的动态关系
J Educ Psychol. 2022 Feb;114(2):215-238. doi: 10.1037/edu0000564. Epub 2021 Oct 11.
4
Average One Year Change in Lexical Measures of Written Narratives for School Age Students.学龄学生书面叙述词汇量指标的平均一年变化情况。
Read Writ Q. 2020;36(3):260-277. doi: 10.1080/10573569.2019.1635544. Epub 2019 Jul 11.
5
Grade Level Expectations in Lexical Measures and Accuracy of Written Narrative Samples.书面叙事样本在词汇量测度和准确性方面的年级水平期望。
J Child Lang Acquis Dev. 2017 Jun;5(2):127-144. Epub 2017 Jun 30.
6
Writing Evaluation: Rater and Task Effects on the Reliability of Writing Scores for Children in Grades 3 and 4.写作评估:评分者与任务对三、四年级儿童写作分数可靠性的影响
Read Writ. 2017 Jun;30(6):1287-1310. doi: 10.1007/s11145-017-9724-6. Epub 2017 Feb 6.
7
Theorization and an Empirical Investigation of the Component-Based and Developmental Text Writing Fluency Construct.基于成分的和发展性文本写作流畅性结构的理论化和实证研究。
J Learn Disabil. 2018 Jul/Aug;51(4):320-335. doi: 10.1177/0022219417712016. Epub 2017 Jun 9.
8
Expanding the developmental models of writing: A direct and indirect effects model of developmental writing (DIEW).拓展写作发展模式:发展性写作直接与间接效应模型(DIEW)
J Educ Psychol. 2017;109(1):35-50. doi: 10.1037/edu0000129.
9
How executive functions predict development in syntactic complexity of narrative writing in the upper elementary grades.执行功能如何预测小学高年级叙事写作句法复杂性的发展。
Read Writ. 2017;30(1):209-231. doi: 10.1007/s11145-016-9670-8. Epub 2016 Jul 1.
10
Reading Comprehension Assessment through Retelling: Performance Profiles of Children with Dyslexia and Language-Based Learning Disability.通过复述进行阅读理解评估:阅读障碍和基于语言的学习障碍儿童的表现概况
Front Psychol. 2016 Jun 1;7:787. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00787. eCollection 2016.