• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

学龄前儿童口吃频率和严重程度的音频与视听测量比较。

Comparisons of audio and audiovisual measures of stuttering frequency and severity in preschool-age children.

作者信息

Rousseau Isabelle, Onslow Mark, Packman Ann, Jones Mark

机构信息

Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia.

出版信息

Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 May;17(2):173-8. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/017).

DOI:10.1044/1058-0360(2008/017)
PMID:18448604
Abstract

PURPOSE

To determine whether measures of stuttering frequency and measures of overall stuttering severity in preschoolers differ when made from audio-only recordings compared with audiovisual recordings.

METHOD

Four blinded speech-language pathologists who had extensive experience with preschoolers who stutter measured stuttering frequency and rated overall severity from audio-only and audiovisual recordings of 36 preschool children who were stuttering. Stuttering frequency (percentage of syllables stuttered [%SS]) was based on counts of perceptually unambiguous stutterings, made in real time, and overall severity was measured using a 9-point rating scale.

RESULTS

Stuttering frequency was statistically significantly lower by around 20% when made from audio-only recordings. This was found to be directly attributable to differences in the counts of stuttered syllables, rather than to differences in the total numbers of syllables spoken. No significant differences were found between recording modalities for the ratings of overall severity. Correlations between %SS scores in the 2 modalities and severity rating scores in the 2 modalities were high, indicating that observers agreed on data trends across speech samples.

CONCLUSIONS

Measures of %SS made from audio-only recordings may underestimate stuttering frequency in preschoolers. Although audio-only %SS measures may underestimate stuttering frequency at the start of a clinical trial to a clinically significant extent, posttreatment scores at or below 1.0%SS are likely to underestimate by 0.2%SS or less, which is clinically insignificant.

摘要

目的

确定仅通过音频记录与视听记录来测量学龄前儿童的口吃频率和整体口吃严重程度时,两者是否存在差异。

方法

四位对学龄前口吃儿童有丰富经验的言语病理学家,对36名口吃学龄前儿童的仅音频记录和视听记录进行口吃频率测量,并对整体严重程度进行评分。口吃频率(口吃音节百分比[%SS])基于实时感知到的明确口吃计数,整体严重程度使用9分制评分量表进行测量。

结果

仅通过音频记录测量的口吃频率在统计学上显著降低约20%。发现这直接归因于口吃音节计数的差异,而非所讲音节总数的差异。在整体严重程度评分方面,两种记录方式之间未发现显著差异。两种方式下的%SS分数与两种方式下的严重程度评分分数之间的相关性很高,表明观察者对语音样本的数据趋势达成了一致。

结论

仅通过音频记录测量的%SS可能会低估学龄前儿童的口吃频率。虽然在临床试验开始时,仅音频的%SS测量可能会在临床上显著低估口吃频率,但治疗后分数在1.0%SS及以下时,可能低估0.2%SS或更少,这在临床上不显著。

相似文献

1
Comparisons of audio and audiovisual measures of stuttering frequency and severity in preschool-age children.学龄前儿童口吃频率和严重程度的音频与视听测量比较。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 May;17(2):173-8. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/017).
2
Comparison of audio and audiovisual measures of adult stuttering: Implications for clinical trials.
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2015 Dec;17(6):589-593. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2015.1026275. Epub 2015 Apr 15.
3
Procedures used for assessment of stuttering frequency and stuttering duration.用于评估口吃频率和口吃持续时间的程序。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Dec;27(12):853-61. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.809791. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
4
A new method to sample stuttering in preschool children.一种对学龄前儿童口吃进行采样的新方法。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010 Jun;12(3):173-7. doi: 10.3109/17549500903464338.
5
The Speech Efficiency Score (SES): A time-domain measure of speech fluency.言语效率评分(SES):一种言语流畅性的时域测量方法。
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Dec;58:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
6
The reliability of simultaneous versus individual data collection during stuttering assessment.口吃评估中同时与单独采集数据的可靠性。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2023 Jul-Aug;58(4):1251-1267. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12860. Epub 2023 Mar 2.
7
Absolute and relative reliability of percentage of syllables stuttered and severity rating scales.音节口吃百分比及严重程度评定量表的绝对可靠性和相对可靠性。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2014 Aug;57(4):1284-95. doi: 10.1044/2014_JSLHR-S-13-0106.
8
A phase II trial of the Westmead Program: syllable-timed speech treatment for pre-school children who stutter.韦斯特米德项目的II期试验:针对口吃学龄前儿童的音节定时言语治疗。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2011 Dec;13(6):500-9. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2011.578660.
9
Clinician percent syllables stuttered, clinician severity ratings and speaker severity ratings: are they interchangeable?临床医生音节口吃百分比、临床医生严重程度评分和说话者严重程度评分:它们可以互换吗?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 May-Jun;49(3):364-8. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12069. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
10
Measurement of stuttering in adults: comparison of stuttering-rate and severity-scaling methods.
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2004 Oct;47(5):1081-7. doi: 10.1044/1092-4388(2004/080).