Rousseau Isabelle, Onslow Mark, Packman Ann, Jones Mark
Australian Stuttering Research Centre, The University of Sydney, Australia.
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 May;17(2):173-8. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/017).
To determine whether measures of stuttering frequency and measures of overall stuttering severity in preschoolers differ when made from audio-only recordings compared with audiovisual recordings.
Four blinded speech-language pathologists who had extensive experience with preschoolers who stutter measured stuttering frequency and rated overall severity from audio-only and audiovisual recordings of 36 preschool children who were stuttering. Stuttering frequency (percentage of syllables stuttered [%SS]) was based on counts of perceptually unambiguous stutterings, made in real time, and overall severity was measured using a 9-point rating scale.
Stuttering frequency was statistically significantly lower by around 20% when made from audio-only recordings. This was found to be directly attributable to differences in the counts of stuttered syllables, rather than to differences in the total numbers of syllables spoken. No significant differences were found between recording modalities for the ratings of overall severity. Correlations between %SS scores in the 2 modalities and severity rating scores in the 2 modalities were high, indicating that observers agreed on data trends across speech samples.
Measures of %SS made from audio-only recordings may underestimate stuttering frequency in preschoolers. Although audio-only %SS measures may underestimate stuttering frequency at the start of a clinical trial to a clinically significant extent, posttreatment scores at or below 1.0%SS are likely to underestimate by 0.2%SS or less, which is clinically insignificant.
确定仅通过音频记录与视听记录来测量学龄前儿童的口吃频率和整体口吃严重程度时,两者是否存在差异。
四位对学龄前口吃儿童有丰富经验的言语病理学家,对36名口吃学龄前儿童的仅音频记录和视听记录进行口吃频率测量,并对整体严重程度进行评分。口吃频率(口吃音节百分比[%SS])基于实时感知到的明确口吃计数,整体严重程度使用9分制评分量表进行测量。
仅通过音频记录测量的口吃频率在统计学上显著降低约20%。发现这直接归因于口吃音节计数的差异,而非所讲音节总数的差异。在整体严重程度评分方面,两种记录方式之间未发现显著差异。两种方式下的%SS分数与两种方式下的严重程度评分分数之间的相关性很高,表明观察者对语音样本的数据趋势达成了一致。
仅通过音频记录测量的%SS可能会低估学龄前儿童的口吃频率。虽然在临床试验开始时,仅音频的%SS测量可能会在临床上显著低估口吃频率,但治疗后分数在1.0%SS及以下时,可能低估0.2%SS或更少,这在临床上不显著。