• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

言语效率评分(SES):一种言语流畅性的时域测量方法。

The Speech Efficiency Score (SES): A time-domain measure of speech fluency.

作者信息

Amir Ofer, Shapira Yair, Mick Liron, Yaruss J Scott

机构信息

Department of Communication Disorder, The Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.

NiNiSpeech Inc., Haifa, Israel.

出版信息

J Fluency Disord. 2018 Dec;58:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 13.

DOI:10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.08.001
PMID:30119862
Abstract

PURPOSE

This study is a preliminary attempt to evaluate a new speech fluency measure, the Speech Efficiency Score (SES), in comparison with subjective stuttering severity rating scales and stuttered syllable counts (%SS).

METHODS

277 listeners (92 naïve, 39 speech-language pathology (SLP) students, 124 practicing SLPs, and 22 SLPs who specialize in stuttering) evaluated short recordings of speech on an 11-point scale. Recordings were obtained from 56 adults, of whom 20 were people who stutter, 16 were people who stutter who were using fluency-shaping techniques, and 20 were speakers who do not stutter. In addition, %SS and the SES measure were obtained for each recording.

RESULTS

The four listener groups rated stuttering severity similarly, with no statistically significant between-group differences. Listeners' responses on the stuttering severity rating scales and the SES yielded significant differences between all three speaker groups. The %SS measure yielded a significant difference only between the stuttering group and the other two groups but not between the fluency-shaping and the control groups. A very strong positive correlation was found between the SES and the subjective stuttering-severity rating scales (r = 0.92). The correlation between %SS and the perceptual evaluation, as well as the correlation between %SS and the SES, were lower, though they still reached significance.

CONCLUSIONS

Results suggest that speech efficiency scores, which are based on a time-domain analysis, closely match subjective stuttering severity ratings and could ultimately provide a more objective way to measure speech fluency.

摘要

目的

本研究是一项初步尝试,旨在评估一种新的言语流畅性测量方法——言语效率得分(SES),并将其与主观口吃严重程度评定量表和口吃音节计数(%SS)进行比较。

方法

277名听众(92名非专业人士、39名言语语言病理学(SLP)专业学生、124名执业言语语言病理学家以及22名专门研究口吃的言语语言病理学家)以11分制对简短的言语录音进行评估。录音来自56名成年人,其中20名是口吃者,16名是正在使用流畅性塑造技术的口吃者,20名是不口吃的说话者。此外,还为每个录音获取了%SS和SES测量值。

结果

四个听众群体对口吃严重程度的评分相似,组间差异无统计学意义。听众在口吃严重程度评定量表和SES上的反应在所有三个说话者群体之间产生了显著差异。%SS测量值仅在口吃组与其他两组之间产生了显著差异,而在流畅性塑造组和对照组之间没有差异。SES与主观口吃严重程度评定量表之间发现了非常强的正相关(r = 0.92)。%SS与感知评估之间的相关性以及%SS与SES之间的相关性较低,尽管它们仍然具有统计学意义。

结论

结果表明,基于时域分析的言语效率得分与主观口吃严重程度评分密切匹配,并最终可能提供一种更客观的方法来测量言语流畅性。

相似文献

1
The Speech Efficiency Score (SES): A time-domain measure of speech fluency.言语效率评分(SES):一种言语流畅性的时域测量方法。
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Dec;58:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
2
Effect of control samples and listener attributes on speech naturalness ratings of people who stutter.对照样本和听众属性对口吃者言语自然度评分的影响。
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Sep;57:59-64. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2017.11.004. Epub 2017 Dec 6.
3
Clinician percent syllables stuttered, clinician severity ratings and speaker severity ratings: are they interchangeable?临床医生音节口吃百分比、临床医生严重程度评分和说话者严重程度评分:它们可以互换吗?
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2014 May-Jun;49(3):364-8. doi: 10.1111/1460-6984.12069. Epub 2013 Dec 4.
4
Envelope modulation spectral (EMS) analyses of solo reading and choral reading conditions suggest changes in speech rhythm in adults who stutter.对单独朗读和合唱朗读条件下的信封调制频谱(EMS)分析表明,口吃成年人的言语节奏存在变化。
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Dec;58:47-60. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Sep 8.
5
Emotional and physiological responses of fluent listeners while watching the speech of adults who stutter.流利听众在观看口吃成年人讲话时的情绪和生理反应。
Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2007 Mar-Apr;42(2):113-29. doi: 10.1080/10610270600850036.
6
Comparisons of audio and audiovisual measures of stuttering frequency and severity in preschool-age children.学龄前儿童口吃频率和严重程度的音频与视听测量比较。
Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008 May;17(2):173-8. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2008/017).
7
Phonological neighborhood effect in spontaneous speech in adults who stutter.口吃成年人自发言语中的语音邻域效应。
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Dec;58:86-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.08.005. Epub 2018 Aug 30.
8
The reliability of a severity rating scale to measure stuttering in an unfamiliar language.一种用于测量不熟悉语言中口吃严重程度的评定量表的可靠性。
Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2014 Jun;16(3):317-26. doi: 10.3109/17549507.2014.898097. Epub 2014 Mar 28.
9
Rhythmic speech and stuttering reduction in a syllable-timed language.音节计时语言中节律性言语与口吃减少
Clin Linguist Phon. 2018;32(10):932-949. doi: 10.1080/02699206.2018.1480655. Epub 2018 Jun 6.
10
Procedures used for assessment of stuttering frequency and stuttering duration.用于评估口吃频率和口吃持续时间的程序。
Clin Linguist Phon. 2013 Dec;27(12):853-61. doi: 10.3109/02699206.2013.809791. Epub 2013 Jul 12.

引用本文的文献

1
FluencyBank Timestamped: An Updated Data Set for Disfluency Detection and Automatic Intended Speech Recognition.流畅度银行时间戳数据集:用于不流畅检测和自动意图语音识别的更新数据集。
J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2024 Nov 7;67(11):4203-4215. doi: 10.1044/2024_JSLHR-24-00070. Epub 2024 Oct 8.