Amir Ofer, Shapira Yair, Mick Liron, Yaruss J Scott
Department of Communication Disorder, The Stanley Steyer School of Health Professions, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel.
NiNiSpeech Inc., Haifa, Israel.
J Fluency Disord. 2018 Dec;58:61-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jfludis.2018.08.001. Epub 2018 Aug 13.
This study is a preliminary attempt to evaluate a new speech fluency measure, the Speech Efficiency Score (SES), in comparison with subjective stuttering severity rating scales and stuttered syllable counts (%SS).
277 listeners (92 naïve, 39 speech-language pathology (SLP) students, 124 practicing SLPs, and 22 SLPs who specialize in stuttering) evaluated short recordings of speech on an 11-point scale. Recordings were obtained from 56 adults, of whom 20 were people who stutter, 16 were people who stutter who were using fluency-shaping techniques, and 20 were speakers who do not stutter. In addition, %SS and the SES measure were obtained for each recording.
The four listener groups rated stuttering severity similarly, with no statistically significant between-group differences. Listeners' responses on the stuttering severity rating scales and the SES yielded significant differences between all three speaker groups. The %SS measure yielded a significant difference only between the stuttering group and the other two groups but not between the fluency-shaping and the control groups. A very strong positive correlation was found between the SES and the subjective stuttering-severity rating scales (r = 0.92). The correlation between %SS and the perceptual evaluation, as well as the correlation between %SS and the SES, were lower, though they still reached significance.
Results suggest that speech efficiency scores, which are based on a time-domain analysis, closely match subjective stuttering severity ratings and could ultimately provide a more objective way to measure speech fluency.
本研究是一项初步尝试,旨在评估一种新的言语流畅性测量方法——言语效率得分(SES),并将其与主观口吃严重程度评定量表和口吃音节计数(%SS)进行比较。
277名听众(92名非专业人士、39名言语语言病理学(SLP)专业学生、124名执业言语语言病理学家以及22名专门研究口吃的言语语言病理学家)以11分制对简短的言语录音进行评估。录音来自56名成年人,其中20名是口吃者,16名是正在使用流畅性塑造技术的口吃者,20名是不口吃的说话者。此外,还为每个录音获取了%SS和SES测量值。
四个听众群体对口吃严重程度的评分相似,组间差异无统计学意义。听众在口吃严重程度评定量表和SES上的反应在所有三个说话者群体之间产生了显著差异。%SS测量值仅在口吃组与其他两组之间产生了显著差异,而在流畅性塑造组和对照组之间没有差异。SES与主观口吃严重程度评定量表之间发现了非常强的正相关(r = 0.92)。%SS与感知评估之间的相关性以及%SS与SES之间的相关性较低,尽管它们仍然具有统计学意义。
结果表明,基于时域分析的言语效率得分与主观口吃严重程度评分密切匹配,并最终可能提供一种更客观的方法来测量言语流畅性。