Kim Youngbae B, Lenke Lawrence G, Kim Yongjung J, Kim Young-Woo, Bridwell Keith H, Stobbs Georgia
Seoul Veterans Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 1;33(10):1125-32. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31816f5f57.
A retrospective study.
To analyze radiographic and functional outcomes after posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusion (PSSIF) with and without an anterior apical release of the lumbar curve in adult scoliosis patients.
No comparison study on PSSIF of adult lumbar scoliosis with apical release versus without has been published.
Forty-eight adult patients with lumbar scoliosis (average age at surgery 49.6 years, average follow-up 3.7 years) who underwent PSSIF were analyzed with respect to radiographic change, perioperative and postoperative complications, and Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) outcome scores. Twenty-three patients underwent an anterior apical release of the lumbar curve via a thoracoabdominal approach followed by PSSIF (Group I). The remaining 25 patients underwent a PSSIF of the lumbar curve followed by anterior column support at the lumbosacral region through an anterior paramedian retroperitoneal or posterior transforaminal approach (Group II).
Before surgery, Group I showed a somewhat larger lumbar major Cobb angle (63.2 degrees vs. 55.9 degrees , P = 0.07), and both groups demonstrated significant differences in lumbar curve flexibility (26.9% vs. 37.2%, P = 0.02) and thoracolumbar kyphosis (27.0 degrees vs. 15.0 degrees , P = 0.03). After surgery, at the ultimate follow-up, there were no significant differences in major Cobb angle, C7 plumbline to the center sacral vertical line (P = 0.17), C7 plumbline to the posterior superior endplate of S1 (P = 0.44), and sagittal Cobb angles at the proximal junction (P = 0.57), T10-L2 (P = 0.24) and T12-S1 (P = 0.51). There were 4 pseudarthroses in Group I and one in Group II (P = 0.02). Postoperative total normalized SRS outcome scores at ultimate follow-up were significantly higher in Group II (69% vs. 79%, P = 0.01).
Posterior segmental spinal instrumentation and fusion without anterior apical release of lumbar curves in adult scoliosis demonstrated better total SRS outcome scores and no differences in radiographic parameters without differences in clinical complications. However, the use of BMP in some of these patients (44%) may have also contributed to these differences.
一项回顾性研究。
分析成年脊柱侧弯患者行后路节段性脊柱内固定融合术(PSSIF)时,腰椎弯有无前路顶点松解的影像学和功能结果。
关于成年腰椎侧弯行PSSIF时有无顶点松解的比较研究尚未发表。
对48例行PSSIF的成年腰椎侧弯患者(手术平均年龄49.6岁,平均随访3.7年)的影像学变化、围手术期及术后并发症以及脊柱侧弯研究学会(SRS)结果评分进行分析。23例患者经胸腹联合入路行腰椎弯前路顶点松解,随后行PSSIF(I组)。其余25例患者先行腰椎弯PSSIF,随后经腹膜外前正中或经椎间孔后入路行腰骶部前柱支撑(II组)。
术前,I组腰椎主 Cobb角稍大(63.2°对55.9°,P = 0.07),两组在腰椎弯柔韧性(26.9%对37.2%,P = 0.02)和胸腰段后凸(27.0°对15.0°,P = 0.03)方面存在显著差异。术后,在末次随访时,主 Cobb角、C7铅垂线至骶骨中心垂直线(P = 0.17)、C7铅垂线至S1后上终板(P = 0.44)以及近端交界、T10-L2(P = 0.24)和T12-S1(P = 0.51)处的矢状面Cobb角均无显著差异。I组有4例假关节形成,II组有1例(P = 0.02)。末次随访时II组术后SRS总标准化结果评分显著更高(69%对79%,P = 0.01)。
成年脊柱侧弯患者行后路节段性脊柱内固定融合术且腰椎弯无前路顶点松解,在影像学参数无差异且临床并发症无差异的情况下,SRS总结果评分更好。然而,这些患者中部分患者(44%)使用骨形态发生蛋白(BMP)也可能导致了这些差异。