Suppr超能文献

成人腰椎长节段内固定并融合至L5或S1后矢状面脊柱排列分析:我们能否预测理想的腰椎前凸?

An analysis of sagittal spinal alignment following long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1: can we predict ideal lumbar lordosis?

作者信息

Kim Yongjung J, Bridwell Keith H, Lenke Lawrence G, Rhim Seungchul, Cheh Gene

机构信息

Washington University Medical Center, St. Louis, MO, USA.

出版信息

Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006 Sep 15;31(20):2343-52. doi: 10.1097/01.brs.0000238970.67552.f5.

Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine factors controlling sagittal spinal balance after long adult lumbar instrumentation and fusion from the thoracolumbar spine to L5 or S1.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

To our knowledge, no study on postoperative sagittal balance following long adult spinal instrumentation and fusion to L5 or S1 has been published.

METHODS

A clinical and radiographic assessment of 80 patients with adult lumbar deformity (average age 53.4 years) who underwent long (average 7.6 vertebrae, 5-11 vertebrae) segmental posterior spinal instrumentation and fusion from the thoracolumbar spine to the L5-S1 (average 4.5 years, 2-15.8-year follow-up) was performed. We defined the optimal sagittal balance (n = 42) group, the distance from C7 plumb to superior posterior endplate of S1 < or = 3.0 cm, and the suboptimal sagittal balance (n = 38) group, the distance from C7 plumb to superior posterior endplate of S1 > 3.0 cm at ultimate follow-up.

RESULTS

The optimal sagittal balance group (C7 plumb, average -0.6 +/- 2.5 cm) had the larger average angle differences between lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis (P < 0.0001), preoperative smaller pelvic incidence (P = 0.007), smaller average thoracolumbar junctional angle (T10-L2) increase (P < 0.0001), and bigger lumbar lordosis angle increase (P = 0.014) at ultimate follow-up. Patients with optimal sagittal balance at ultimate follow-up had significantly higher total Scoliosis Research Society 24 outcome scores than those with suboptimal sagittal balance (P = 0.015). Risk factors that were statistically significant for the suboptimal sagittal balance group included pelvic incidence compared with lumbar lordosis (> or = 45 degrees) before surgery (vs. < 45 degrees, P = 0.009), smaller lumbar lordosis compared with thoracic kyphosis (< 20 degrees) at 8 weeks postoperatively (vs. > or = 20 degrees, P = 0.013), and older than 55 years of age at surgery (vs. 55 years or younger, P = 0.024).

CONCLUSION

A sagittal Cobb angle difference between lumbar lordosis and thoracic kyphosis of > 20 degrees (higher lumbar lordosis) is advisable in most circumstances to achieve optimal sagittal balance.

摘要

研究设计

一项回顾性研究。

目的

确定在成人从胸腰椎至L5或S1进行长节段腰椎器械固定融合术后控制矢状面脊柱平衡的因素。

背景资料总结

据我们所知,尚无关于成人从胸腰椎至L5或S1进行长节段脊柱器械固定融合术后矢状面平衡的研究发表。

方法

对80例成人腰椎畸形患者(平均年龄53.4岁)进行临床和影像学评估,这些患者接受了从胸腰椎至L5-S1的长节段(平均7.6个椎体,5 - 11个椎体)后路脊柱器械固定融合术(平均随访4.5年,2 - 15.8年)。我们定义了最佳矢状面平衡组(n = 42),即最终随访时C7铅垂线至S1上终板的距离≤3.0 cm,以及非最佳矢状面平衡组(n = 38),即最终随访时C7铅垂线至S1上终板的距离>3.0 cm。

结果

最佳矢状面平衡组(C7铅垂线,平均 - 0.6±2.5 cm)在腰椎前凸与胸椎后凸之间的平均角度差更大(P<0.0001),术前骨盆倾斜度更小(P = 0.007),胸腰段交界角(T10 - L2)平均增加幅度更小(P<0.0001),在最终随访时腰椎前凸角增加幅度更大(P = 0.014)。最终随访时矢状面平衡最佳的患者,其脊柱侧弯研究学会24项结果评分显著高于矢状面平衡欠佳的患者(P = 0.015)。非最佳矢状面平衡组具有统计学意义的危险因素包括术前骨盆倾斜度与腰椎前凸相比(≥45度)(vs.<45度,P = 0.009),术后8周时腰椎前凸与胸椎后凸相比更小(<20度)(vs.≥20度,P = 0.013),以及手术时年龄大于55岁(vs. 55岁及以下,P = 0.024)。

结论

在大多数情况下,腰椎前凸与胸椎后凸之间的矢状面Cobb角差>20度(腰椎前凸更大)有利于实现最佳矢状面平衡。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验