• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估智利的科学实力。

Assessing the scientific strength of Chile.

作者信息

Brown C G, Coward H R, Stowe R C

机构信息

Division of International Programs, National Science Foundation, Washington, D.C.

出版信息

Arch Biol Med Exp. 1991;24(1):37-47.

PMID:1845016
Abstract

We use analysis of co-citation and relative citation rates to assess the scientific strength of Chile as compared with other developing countries and to evaluate the potential for increased international collaboration between Chile and the United States in science and engineering. Co-citation is the citation of two scientific papers by a third paper. By examining frequency and patterns of co-citation, the intellectual structure and evolution of scientific disciplines and research specialties can be traced. Chile is especially "strong", as defined by the co-citation model we employ, in biomedicine and clinical medicine, and in astronomy. A relative citation rate is the ratio of the number of citations a paper receives to the average number of citations for all papers published in the same journal over time. Analysis of relative citation rates of papers published by authors with Chilean addresses show that Chilean physics, including earth and space sciences, is of unusually high quality, considerably higher than any other developing country and comparable to several industrialized countries. We conclude that Chile's scientific capacity is advanced enough to absorb and benefit significantly from strategic additions to the country's resources and capabilities for research. These would include increases in: exchanges of researchers in specific fields with U.S. and other Latin American academic, industrial, and government scientists and engineers; training at outstanding U.S. and Latin American institutions; laboratory equipment, computer time, communications links, and library materials; and funding from U.S. and international organizations. It is also apparent that Chile is strong enough in certain fields to cooperate with the U.S. in mutually beneficial international efforts.

摘要

我们运用共被引分析和相对被引率来评估智利与其他发展中国家相比的科学实力,并评估智利与美国在科学和工程领域加强国际合作的潜力。共被引是指第三篇论文对两篇科学论文的引用。通过考察共被引的频率和模式,可以追溯科学学科和研究专业的知识结构与演变。按照我们所采用的共被引模型来定义,智利在生物医学、临床医学以及天文学领域尤为“强大”。相对被引率是一篇论文获得的被引次数与同一期刊随时间发表的所有论文的平均被引次数之比。对有智利地址的作者发表的论文的相对被引率分析表明,智利的物理学,包括地球和空间科学,质量异常高,大大高于任何其他发展中国家,可与几个工业化国家相媲美。我们得出结论,智利的科研能力足够先进,能够从对该国研究资源和能力的战略性补充中大量吸收并受益。这些补充包括:在特定领域与美国及其他拉丁美洲学术、工业和政府科学家及工程师进行研究人员交流;在美国和拉丁美洲的优秀机构接受培训;实验室设备、计算机时间、通信链接和图书馆资料;以及来自美国和国际组织的资金。同样明显的是,智利在某些领域实力雄厚,足以与美国在互利的国际合作中开展合作。

相似文献

1
Assessing the scientific strength of Chile.评估智利的科学实力。
Arch Biol Med Exp. 1991;24(1):37-47.
2
Dynamics of co-authorship and productivity across different fields of scientific research.不同科研领域的合作作者关系与产出动态
PLoS One. 2018 Jan 10;13(1):e0189742. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0189742. eCollection 2018.
3
Biological sciences in Chile and South America, 1981-1991: a citationist perspective. Output data and specialty area impact trends.1981 - 1991年智利和南美洲的生物科学:引文分析视角。产出数据与专业领域影响趋势。
Biol Res. 1994;27(2):91-103.
4
Multiple Citation Indicators and Their Composite across Scientific Disciplines.跨学科的多种引用指标及其综合指标
PLoS Biol. 2016 Jul 1;14(7):e1002501. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002501. eCollection 2016 Jul.
5
Influence of international co-authorship on the research citation impact of young universities.国际合著对年轻大学研究被引影响力的影响。
Scientometrics. 2016;107:1095-1110. doi: 10.1007/s11192-016-1905-6. Epub 2016 Mar 15.
6
[Production of scientific articles about health in six Latin American countries, 1973-1992].[1973年至1992年六个拉丁美洲国家关于健康的科学文章产出]
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 1997 Jan;1(1):23-34.
7
The Pagerank-Index: Going beyond Citation Counts in Quantifying Scientific Impact of Researchers.PageRank指数:超越引用次数来量化研究人员的科学影响力
PLoS One. 2015 Aug 19;10(8):e0134794. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0134794. eCollection 2015.
8
[Network of international scientific collaboration on smoking: analysis of coauthorship through the Science Citation Index (1999-2003)].[吸烟领域国际科学合作网络:通过科学引文索引对共同作者情况的分析(1999 - 2003年)]
Gac Sanit. 2009 May-Jun;23(3):222.e34-43. doi: 10.1016/j.gaceta.2008.05.002. Epub 2009 May 23.
9
The relevance and recognition of Latin American science. Introduction to the fourth issue of CBP-Latin America.拉丁美洲科学的相关性与认可度。《CBP - 拉丁美洲》第四期引言。
Comp Biochem Physiol C Toxicol Pharmacol. 2007 Jul-Aug;146(1-2):1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cbpc.2007.05.005. Epub 2007 Jun 6.
10
[Breast pathology: evaluation of the Portuguese scientific activity based on bibliometric indicators].[乳腺病理学:基于文献计量指标对葡萄牙科研活动的评估]
Acta Med Port. 2006 May-Jun;19(3):225-34. Epub 2006 Sep 7.

引用本文的文献

1
How has healthcare research performance been assessed?: a systematic review.如何评估医疗保健研究绩效?:系统评价。
J R Soc Med. 2011 Jun;104(6):251-61. doi: 10.1258/jrsm.2011.110005.