Pellegrini Filho A, Goldbaum M, Silvi J
División de Salud y Desarrollo Humano, Organización Panamericana de la Salud, Washington, DC 20037, USA.
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 1997 Jan;1(1):23-34.
The production of articles resulting from biomedical, clinical, and public health studies that originated in Argentina, Brazil, Chile, Cuba, Mexico, and Venezuela from 1973 through 1992 was analyzed to discover trends in health research in Latin America. From the database of the Institute for Scientific Information (ISI), 41,238 articles with first authors who resided in those countries were extracted. These articles were analyzed by subject area, type of study, country, number of authors and institutions that participated in the investigation, and citations received by each article. Also analyzed were 95 articles in epidemiology selected from a pool of 570 published by authors from the six countries in 11 public health journals that enjoy international prestige. The results showed that the number of published works increased by 117% between the first and last five-year periods within the study period. Clinical research was distributed the most evenly among the countries, and public health research was the most concentrated (60.7% originated in Brazil). The numbers of biomedical and public health research articles showed relatively more growth than those reporting on clinical research throughout the period. A relative decrease was found in articles by only one author, which suggests a greater frequency of team efforts, and an increase was seen in articles with authors tied to two or more national or foreign institutions, which indicates greater cooperation between institutions and countries. The average number of citations received by each article was 3, which was less than half the number received by the articles in the ISI database (7.78). Regarding the subset of 95 articles in epidemiology, the great majority (96%) dealt with infectious diseases or maternal and child health, while in the international literature 78% of such articles were about chronic diseases. This group of articles gave evidence of more cooperation with international institutions and had a citation index of 4.36 per article. It is concluded that, despite the inherent limitations, this type of study reveals some general trends in the development of research in the six Latin American countries with the greatest scientific production and makes it possible to formulate hypotheses on the factors that influence these trends. Taken with the paper caution, the results of studies like this one can be of great value in defining health science and technology policies.
对1973年至1992年源自阿根廷、巴西、智利、古巴、墨西哥和委内瑞拉的生物医学、临床和公共卫生研究成果的发表情况进行了分析,以发现拉丁美洲卫生研究的趋势。从科学信息研究所(ISI)的数据库中,提取了41238篇第一作者居住在这些国家的文章。这些文章按主题领域、研究类型、国家、参与调查的作者和机构数量以及每篇文章的被引次数进行了分析。还从11种享有国际声誉的公共卫生期刊上发表的570篇文章中,挑选了95篇来自这六个国家作者的流行病学文章进行分析。结果表明,在研究期间的第一个和最后一个五年期之间,发表作品的数量增加了117%。临床研究在各国之间分布最为均匀,而公共卫生研究最为集中(60.7%源自巴西)。在整个时期,生物医学和公共卫生研究文章的数量增长相对比临床研究报告的文章数量更多。发现独著文章数量相对减少,这表明团队合作的频率更高,而与两个或更多国家或外国机构有关联的作者的文章数量增加,这表明机构和国家之间的合作更多。每篇文章的平均被引次数为3次,不到ISI数据库中文章被引次数(7.78次)的一半。关于95篇流行病学文章的子集,绝大多数(96%)涉及传染病或母婴健康,而在国际文献中,此类文章的78%是关于慢性病的。这组文章显示出与国际机构有更多合作,每篇文章的被引指数为4.36。结论是,尽管存在固有局限性,但这类研究揭示了六个科学产出最多的拉丁美洲国家研究发展的一些总体趋势,并有可能就影响这些趋势的因素提出假设。谨慎看待本文,此类研究结果对于确定卫生科学和技术政策可能具有重要价值。