Choi Seung Ho, Koo Bon-Nyeo, Nam Soon Ho, Lee Sung Jin, Kim Ki Jun, Kil Hae Keum, Lee Ki-Young, Jeon Dong Hyuk
Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Yonsei University, College of Medicine, 250 Seongsanno, Seodaemun-gu, Seoul 120-752, Korea.
Yonsei Med J. 2008 Apr 30;49(2):204-10. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2008.49.2.204.
In this randomized, double-blind study, we investigated the analgesic efficacy and side effects of continuous constant-dose infusions of remifentanil after total abdominal hysterectomy and compared it to fentanyl.
Fifty-six adult female patients scheduled for elective total abdominal hysterectomy were enrolled in this study. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups according to fentanyl (group F, n=28) or remifentanil (group R, n=28) for postoperative analgesia. Patients in group F were given fentanyl intravenously with an infusion rate of fentanyl 0.5 microg/kg/hr; group R was given remifentanil with an infusion rate of remifentanil 0.05 microg/kg/min for 2 days. Pain intensity at rest, occurrence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), dizziness, pruritus, and respiratory depression were assessed 1 hr after arrival at the post-anesthesia care unit, at 6; 12; 24; and 48 hr post-operation and 6 hr post-infusion of the study drug. Pain was evaluated by using visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-10). The time that patients first requested analgesics was recorded as well as additional analgesics and antiemetics.
There were no significant differences in VAS, time to first postoperative analgesics, and additional analgesics between the 2 groups. The incidences and severities of PONV and opioid related side effects were not different between the groups; however, there were 3 episodes (10.7%) of serious respiratory depression in group R.
Continuous infusion technique of remifentanil did not reveal any benefits compared to fentanyl. Furthermore, it is not safe for postoperative analgesia in the general ward.
在这项随机、双盲研究中,我们调查了全腹子宫切除术后持续恒量输注瑞芬太尼的镇痛效果和副作用,并将其与芬太尼进行比较。
本研究纳入了56例计划行择期全腹子宫切除术的成年女性患者。根据使用芬太尼(F组,n = 28)或瑞芬太尼(R组,n = 28)进行术后镇痛,将患者随机分为两组。F组患者静脉输注芬太尼,输注速率为0.5微克/千克/小时;R组患者输注瑞芬太尼,输注速率为0.05微克/千克/分钟,持续2天。在到达麻醉后护理单元1小时后、术后6、12、24和48小时以及研究药物输注后6小时,评估静息时的疼痛强度、术后恶心呕吐(PONV)的发生率、头晕、瘙痒和呼吸抑制情况。使用视觉模拟量表(VAS;0 - 10)评估疼痛。记录患者首次要求使用镇痛药的时间以及额外使用的镇痛药和止吐药。
两组之间在VAS、首次术后使用镇痛药的时间和额外使用的镇痛药方面无显著差异。两组之间PONV和阿片类药物相关副作用的发生率和严重程度无差异;然而,R组有3例(10.7%)严重呼吸抑制事件。
与芬太尼相比,瑞芬太尼的持续输注技术未显示出任何优势。此外,在普通病房用于术后镇痛不安全。