Etzioni Ruth
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, WA 98109-1024, USA.
Urol Oncol. 2008 May-Jun;26(3):308-15. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2006.11.008. Epub 2007 Nov 7.
Thorough evaluation of a screening test requires conducting a series of studies to ascertain its ability to detect accurately disease, as well as its benefits and costs. In this article, I review the steps involved in evaluating a screening test, using the case of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening for prostate cancer as a case study. I discuss designs for quantifying the diagnostic properties of a screening test and compare several different studies that have produced quite different estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of PSA screening. I also review methods that may be used to combine other markers or tests with PSA to improve test accuracy. Determining the benefits of a screening test is complex, particularly when information from randomized trials is lacking. I review several observational studies of PSA benefit and discuss the use of computer models for inferring the impact of screening from trends in population mortality.
Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2009-6
J Natl Cancer Inst. 1980-5
Rural Remote Health. 2009
Methods Mol Biol. 2009
Grand rounds Urol. 2009-8
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013-1-31
J Cyst Fibros. 2013-3