• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

土壤硫改良剂可抑制苜蓿和西部小麦草对硒的吸收。

Soil sulfur amendments suppress selenium uptake by alfalfa and Western wheatgrass.

作者信息

Mackowiak C L, Amacher M C

机构信息

University of Florida, North Florida Research and Education Center, 155 Research Drive, Quincy, FL 32351-5677, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2008 May 2;37(3):772-9. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007.0157. Print 2008 May-Jun.

DOI:10.2134/jeq2007.0157
PMID:18453397
Abstract

Selenium (Se) is a potential soil contaminant in many parts of the world where it can pose a health risk to livestock and wildlife. Phosphate ore mining in Southeast Idaho has resulted in numerous waste rock dumps revegetated with forages to stabilize the dumps and support grazing. Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), smooth brome (Bromus inermis Leyss.), and western wheat grass [Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) A. Löve] are the dominant forage species on these lands. To demonstrate the feasibility of using sulfur (S) as a soil amendment to restrict plant Se uptake, 3 kg pots containing 50:50 w/w soil and waste shale were uniformly mixed with 0, 0.5, 1.0, or 2.0 Mg ha(-1) S as either elemental S or gypsum. Pots were seeded with alfalfa or western wheat grass. Dry mass and tissue Se were monitored over several clippings. Soils were sampled at the conclusion of the study and analyzed for water-soluble, oxalate-extractable, and total Se. Sulfur amendments as either elemental S or gypsum at 1.0 Mg ha(-1) or greater equally suppressed Se uptake over 60% in both forage species. Alfalfa accumulated more Se than western wheat grass. Plant removal via successive clippings resulted in lower tissue Se accumulation over time than the use of S soil amendments alone. Alfalfa-planted soils contained lower water-soluble and oxalate-extractable Se than did the non-planted controls while western wheat grass-planted soils contained lower water-soluble Se. Applying S to these shale-based soils may be an economically viable option for treating Se-impacted, revegetated lands.

摘要

在世界许多地方,硒(Se)都是一种潜在的土壤污染物,会对牲畜和野生动物的健康构成风险。爱达荷州东南部的磷矿开采产生了大量废石堆,人们用草料对其进行植被恢复,以稳定矿堆并支持放牧。紫花苜蓿(Medicago sativa L.)、无芒雀麦(Bromus inermis Leyss.)和西部小麦草[Pascopyrum smithii (Rydb.) A. Löve]是这些土地上的主要草料品种。为了证明使用硫(S)作为土壤改良剂来限制植物对硒的吸收的可行性,将装有50:50重量比土壤和废页岩的3千克花盆与0、0.5、1.0或2.0 Mg ha(-1)的硫以单质硫或石膏的形式均匀混合。花盆中播种了紫花苜蓿或西部小麦草。在多次刈割过程中监测干物质和组织中的硒含量。在研究结束时对土壤进行采样,并分析水溶性、草酸盐可提取和总硒含量。以单质硫或石膏形式添加1.0 Mg ha(-1)及以上的硫改良剂,在两种草料品种中均能同等程度地抑制硒吸收超过60%。紫花苜蓿比西部小麦草积累的硒更多。通过连续刈割去除植物导致随着时间推移组织中的硒积累低于仅使用硫土壤改良剂的情况。种植紫花苜蓿的土壤中水溶性和草酸盐可提取的硒含量低于未种植的对照土壤,而种植西部小麦草的土壤中水溶性硒含量较低。对这些基于页岩的土壤施用硫可能是治理受硒影响的植被恢复土地的一种经济可行的选择。

相似文献

1
Soil sulfur amendments suppress selenium uptake by alfalfa and Western wheatgrass.土壤硫改良剂可抑制苜蓿和西部小麦草对硒的吸收。
J Environ Qual. 2008 May 2;37(3):772-9. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007.0157. Print 2008 May-Jun.
2
Selenium and sulfur accumulation and soil selenium dissipation in planting of four herbaceous plant species in soil contaminated with drainage sediment rich in both selenium and sulfur.在富含硒和硫的排水沉积物污染土壤中种植四种草本植物时的硒和硫积累及土壤硒消散情况
Int J Phytoremediation. 2003;5(1):25-40. doi: 10.1080/16226510390856457.
3
Phytoremediation management of selenium-laden drainage sediments in the San Luis Drain: a greenhouse feasibility study.圣路易斯排水渠中含硒排水沉积物的植物修复管理:温室可行性研究
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2005 Nov;62(3):309-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2004.10.013. Epub 2004 Dec 15.
4
Bioextraction of selenium by forage and selected field legume species in selenium-laden soils under minimal field management conditions.在最少田间管理条件下,富硒土壤中饲料及选定田间豆科植物对硒的生物提取作用
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 1996 Aug;34(3):228-38. doi: 10.1006/eesa.1996.0068.
5
Selenium volatilization in vegetated agricultural drainage sediment from the San Luis Drain, Central California.加利福尼亚中部圣路易斯排水渠植被覆盖的农业排水沉积物中的硒挥发
Chemosphere. 2005 Sep;60(9):1203-13. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2005.02.033. Epub 2005 Apr 9.
6
Speciation of Se and DOC in soil solution and their relation to Se bioavailability.土壤溶液中硒和溶解性有机碳的形态及其与硒生物可给性的关系。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Jan 1;45(1):262-7. doi: 10.1021/es1016119. Epub 2010 Dec 8.
7
Review of 15 years of research on ecotoxicology and remediation of land contaminated by agricultural drainage sediment rich in selenium.对15年以来富硒农业排水沉积物污染土地的生态毒理学与修复研究的综述。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2004 Mar;57(3):257-69. doi: 10.1016/S0147-6513(03)00064-2.
8
Chemical speciation and bioavailability of selenium in the rhizosphere of Symphyotrichum eatonii from reclaimed mine soils.矿区废弃地生长的一枝黄花根际硒的化学形态与生物有效性。
Environ Sci Technol. 2011 Feb 1;45(3):870-5. doi: 10.1021/es1029766. Epub 2010 Dec 17.
9
Freezing and drying effects on potential plant contributions to phosphorus in runoff.冷冻和干燥对径流中植物潜在磷贡献的影响。
J Environ Qual. 2007 Mar 1;36(2):532-9. doi: 10.2134/jeq2006.0169. Print 2007 Mar-Apr.
10
Bioavailability of selenium to forage crops in a sandy loam soil amended with Se-rich plant materials.在添加富硒植物材料改良的砂壤土中,硒对饲料作物的生物有效性。
Chemosphere. 2007 Jan;66(9):1734-43. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.07.006. Epub 2006 Aug 21.

引用本文的文献

1
Genetic Biofortification of Winter Wheat with Selenium (Se).用硒(Se)对冬小麦进行遗传生物强化
Plants (Basel). 2024 Jul 1;13(13):1816. doi: 10.3390/plants13131816.
2
The impact of feeding supplemental minerals to sheep on the return of micronutrients to pasture via urine and faeces.给绵羊喂食补充矿物质对通过尿液和粪便使微量营养素返回牧场的影响。
Sci Rep. 2023 Feb 16;13(1):2747. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-29717-3.
3
A critical analysis of sources, pollution, and remediation of selenium, an emerging contaminant.对硒这一新兴污染物的来源、污染及修复的批判性分析。
Environ Geochem Health. 2023 May;45(5):1359-1389. doi: 10.1007/s10653-022-01354-1. Epub 2022 Aug 16.
4
Selenium Biofortification and Interaction With Other Elements in Plants: A Review.植物中的硒生物强化及其与其他元素的相互作用:综述
Front Plant Sci. 2020 Nov 5;11:586421. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2020.586421. eCollection 2020.