Suppr超能文献

土壤磷素状况对草甘膦和草铵膦环境风险评估的影响

Effects of soil phosphorus status on environmental risk assessment of glyphosate and glufosinate-ammonium.

作者信息

Laitinen Pirkko, Siimes Katri, Rämö Sari, Jauhiainen Lauri, Eronen Liisa, Oinonen Seija, Hartikainen Helinä

机构信息

MTT Agrifood Research Finland, Jokioinen, Finland.

出版信息

J Environ Qual. 2008 May 2;37(3):830-8. doi: 10.2134/jeq2007.0256. Print 2008 May-Jun.

Abstract

The increased use of herbicides poses a risk to the aquatic environment. Easy and economical methods are needed to identify the fields where specific environment protection measures are needed. Phosphorus (P) and organophosphorus herbicides compete for the same adsorption sites in soil. In this study the relationship between P obtained in routine Finnish agronomic tests (acid ammonium acetate [P(AC)]) and adsorption of glyphosate and glufosinate-ammonium was investigated to determine whether P(AC) values could be used in the risk assessment. The adsorption of glyphosate ((N-(phosphonomethyl)glycine) and glufosinate-ammonium (2-amino-4-(hydroxymethylphosphinyl)butanoic acid) was studied in a clay and a sandy loam soil enriched with increasing amounts of P added as potassium dihydrogen phosphate. Desorption was also determined for some P-enriched soil samples. The adsorption of both herbicides diminished with increasing P(AC) value. The correlations between Freundlich adsorption coefficients obtained in the adsorption tests and P(AC) were nonlinear but significant (r > 0.98) in both soils. The exponential models of the relationship between soil P(AC) values and glyphosate adsorption were found to fit well to an independent Finnish soil data set (P < 0.1 for glyphosate and P < 0.01 for glufosinate-ammonium). The desorption results showed that glufosinate-ammonium sorption is not inversely related to soil P status, and the high correlation coefficients obtained in the test of the model were thus artifacts caused by an abnormal concentration of exchangeable potassium in soil. The solved equations are a useful tool in assessing the leaching risks of glyphosate, but their use for glufosinate-ammonium is questionable.

摘要

除草剂使用量的增加对水生环境构成了风险。需要简便且经济的方法来确定哪些田地需要采取特定的环境保护措施。磷(P)和有机磷除草剂会竞争土壤中的相同吸附位点。在本研究中,研究了芬兰常规农艺测试中获得的磷(酸性乙酸铵[P(AC)])与草甘膦和草铵膦吸附之间的关系,以确定P(AC)值是否可用于风险评估。在添加磷酸二氢钾使磷含量不断增加的黏土和砂壤土中,研究了草甘膦(N-(膦酰基甲基)甘氨酸)和草铵膦(2-氨基-4-(羟甲基膦酰基)丁酸)的吸附情况。还测定了一些富磷土壤样品的解吸情况。两种除草剂的吸附量均随P(AC)值的增加而降低。在两种土壤中,吸附试验获得的弗伦德利希吸附系数与P(AC)之间的相关性呈非线性,但显著(r > 0.98)。发现土壤P(AC)值与草甘膦吸附之间关系的指数模型与芬兰独立土壤数据集拟合良好(草甘膦P < 0.1,草铵膦P < 0.01)。解吸结果表明,草铵膦的吸附与土壤磷状况并非呈反比关系,因此模型测试中获得的高相关系数是由土壤中可交换钾浓度异常导致的假象。所求解的方程是评估草甘膦淋溶风险的有用工具,但将其用于草铵膦则存在疑问。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验