Förster Jens, Liberman Nira, Friedman Ronald S
Jacobs University Bremen, School of Humanities and Social Sciences, Bremen, Germany.
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2007 Aug;11(3):211-33. doi: 10.1177/1088868307303029.
Countless studies have recently purported to demonstrate effects of goal priming; however, it is difficult to muster unambiguous support for the claims of these studies because of the lack of clear criteria for determining whether goals, as opposed to alternative varieties of mental representations, have indeed been activated. Therefore, the authors offer theoretical guidelines that may help distinguish between semantic, procedural, and goal priming. Seven principles that are hallmarks of self-regulatory processes are proposed: Goal-priming effects (a) involve value, (b) involve postattainment decrements in motivation, (c) involve gradients as a function of distance to the goal, (d) are proportional to the product of expectancy and value, (e) involve inhibition of conflicting goals, (f) involve self-control, and (g) are moderated by equifinality and multifinality. How these principles might help distinguish between automatic activation of goals and priming effects that do not involve goals is discussed.
最近,无数研究声称证明了目标启动的效果;然而,由于缺乏明确的标准来确定与其他类型的心理表征相对的目标是否真的被激活,因此很难为这些研究的主张提供明确的支持。因此,作者提供了一些理论指导方针,可能有助于区分语义启动、程序启动和目标启动。提出了七条作为自我调节过程标志的原则:目标启动效应(a)涉及价值,(b)涉及达成目标后动机的降低,(c)涉及作为与目标距离函数的梯度,(d)与期望和价值的乘积成正比,(e)涉及对冲突目标的抑制,(f)涉及自我控制,以及(g)受等效性和多终性调节。讨论了这些原则如何有助于区分目标的自动激活和不涉及目标的启动效应。