• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

群体判断与决策中的动机性信息处理

Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making.

作者信息

De Dreu Carsten K W, Nijstad Bernard A, van Knippenberg Daan

机构信息

University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008 Feb;12(1):22-49. doi: 10.1177/1088868307304092.

DOI:10.1177/1088868307304092
PMID:18453471
Abstract

This article expands the view of groups as information processors into a motivated information processing in groups (MIP-G) model by emphasizing, first, the mixed-motive structure of many group tasks and, second, the idea that individuals engage in more or less deliberate information search and processing. The MIP-G model postulates that social motivation drives the kind of information group members attend to, encode, and retrieve and that epistemic motivation drives the degree to which new information is sought and attended to, encoded, and retrieved. Social motivation and epistemic motivation are expected to influence, alone and in combination, generating problem solutions, disseminating information, and negotiating joint decisions. The MIP-G model integrates the influence of many individual and situational differences and combines insight on human thinking with group-level interaction process and decision making.

摘要

本文通过强调以下两点,将群体作为信息处理器的观点扩展为群体动机性信息处理(MIP-G)模型:其一,许多群体任务的混合动机结构;其二,个体或多或少会进行深思熟虑的信息搜索和处理这一观点。MIP-G模型假定,社会动机驱动群体成员关注、编码和检索的信息类型,而认知动机驱动寻求、关注、编码和检索新信息的程度。社会动机和认知动机预计会单独或共同影响问题解决方案的产生、信息的传播以及联合决策的协商。MIP-G模型整合了许多个体和情境差异的影响,并将对人类思维的见解与群体层面的互动过程及决策相结合。

相似文献

1
Motivated information processing in group judgment and decision making.群体判断与决策中的动机性信息处理
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008 Feb;12(1):22-49. doi: 10.1177/1088868307304092.
2
Motivated information processing, social tuning, and group creativity.动机信息处理、社会协调和群体创造力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Oct;99(4):622-37. doi: 10.1037/a0019386.
3
Team negotiation: social, epistemic, economic, and psychological consequences of subgroup conflict.团队谈判:亚群体冲突的社会、认知、经济及心理后果
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2008 Dec;34(12):1687-702. doi: 10.1177/0146167208324102. Epub 2008 Oct 2.
4
Motivated information processing, strategic choice, and the quality of negotiated agreement.动机性信息处理、策略选择与协商协议的质量。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2006 Jun;90(6):927-43. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.6.927.
5
It takes one to tango: the effects of dyads' epistemic motivation composition in negotiation.一个巴掌拍不响:谈判中二元体认知动机构成的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010 Nov;36(11):1454-66. doi: 10.1177/0146167210383698. Epub 2010 Sep 14.
6
Group performance and decision making.团队绩效与决策制定。
Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:623-55. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142009.
7
Building team adaptive capacity: the roles of sensegiving and team composition.构建团队适应能力:意义赋予和团队构成的作用。
J Appl Psychol. 2011 May;96(3):525-40. doi: 10.1037/a0022622.
8
Hidden profiles and concealed information: strategic information sharing and use in group decision making.隐藏的概况与隐蔽的信息:群体决策中的战略信息共享与运用
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jun;35(6):793-806. doi: 10.1177/0146167209333176. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
9
Motivated Cognition in Cooperation.合作中的动机认知。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;19(2):385-403. doi: 10.1177/17456916231193990. Epub 2023 Oct 26.
10
Giving advice or making decisions in someone else's place: the influence of impression, defense, and accuracy motivation on the search for new information.在他人的立场上提供建议或做出决策:印象、防御和准确性动机对新信息搜索的影响。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2005 Jul;31(7):977-90. doi: 10.1177/0146167204274095.

引用本文的文献

1
Cogito, Ergo Contraho: Think Big or Think Small? How Construal Level Theory Shapes Creative Agreements.我思,故我缔约:着眼大局还是着眼小处?解释水平理论如何塑造创造性协议。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Jun 4;15(6):775. doi: 10.3390/bs15060775.
2
Message source effects on rejection and costly punishment of criticism across cultures.信息源对跨文化背景下批评的拒绝及代价高昂的惩罚的影响。
Commun Psychol. 2025 Apr 16;3(1):64. doi: 10.1038/s44271-025-00248-z.
3
Emotional Valence, Interdependence, and Job Autonomy as Predictors of Creativity Through Perspective-Taking: An Integrative Model.
通过换位思考,情绪效价、相互依赖和工作自主性作为创造力的预测因素:一个整合模型。
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;15(3):284. doi: 10.3390/bs15030284.
4
Thinking and Learning in Nested Systems: The Classroom Level.嵌套系统中的思维与学习:课堂层面
J Chem Educ. 2024 Jan 23;101(2):295-306. doi: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c00839. eCollection 2024 Feb 13.
5
From Integrated Care to Integrating Care: A Conceptual Framework of Behavioural Processes Underlying Effective Collaboration in Care.从整合照护到整合式照护:有效协作照护背后行为过程的概念框架
Int J Integr Care. 2023 Oct 18;23(4):4. doi: 10.5334/ijic.7446. eCollection 2023 Oct-Dec.
6
Hotspots and research trends of the 'dark side of creativity' in the last decade.过去十年中“创造力的阴暗面”的热点与研究趋势。
Heliyon. 2023 Sep 22;9(10):e20392. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e20392. eCollection 2023 Oct.
7
Group Formation and the Evolution of Human Social Organization.群体形成与人类社会组织的演化。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2024 Mar;19(2):320-334. doi: 10.1177/17456916231179156. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
8
Exploring the impact of motivations on individual online and offline preventive actions against COVID-19.探究动机对个体针对新冠病毒采取的线上和线下预防行动的影响。
Curr Psychol. 2023 Feb 6:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s12144-023-04283-z.
9
Problem-solving in groups of common marmosets (): more than the sum of its parts.普通狨猴群体中的问题解决:不止是各部分的总和
PNAS Nexus. 2022 Sep 14;1(4):pgac168. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgac168. eCollection 2022 Sep.
10
Managing healthcare employees' burnout through micro aspects of corporate social responsibility: A public health perspective.通过企业社会责任的微观方面来管理医疗保健员工的倦怠:公共卫生视角。
Front Public Health. 2023 Jan 9;10:1050867. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1050867. eCollection 2022.