Toma Claudia, Butera Fabrizio
University of Grenoble.
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2009 Jun;35(6):793-806. doi: 10.1177/0146167209333176. Epub 2009 Mar 30.
Two experiments investigated the differential impact of cooperation and competition on strategic information sharing and use in a three-person group decision-making task. Information was distributed in order to create a hidden profile so that disconfirmation of group members' initial preferences was required to solve the task. Experiment 1 revealed that competition, compared to cooperation, led group members to withhold unshared information, a difference that was not significant for shared information. In competition, compared to cooperation, group members were also more reluctant to disconfirm their initial preferences. Decision quality was lower in competition than in cooperation, this effect being mediated by disconfirmation use and not by information sharing. Experiment 2 replicated these findings and revealed the role of mistrust in predicting strategic information sharing and use in competition. These results support a motivated information processing approach of group decision making.
两项实验研究了合作与竞争对三人小组决策任务中战略信息共享和使用的不同影响。信息的分布方式旨在营造一种隐藏特征,从而需要否定小组成员的初始偏好才能解决任务。实验1表明,与合作相比,竞争会导致小组成员隐瞒未共享的信息,而对于共享信息,这种差异并不显著。与合作相比,在竞争中,小组成员也更不愿意否定他们的初始偏好。竞争中的决策质量低于合作中的决策质量,这种效应是由对初始偏好的否定运用介导的,而非信息共享。实验2重复了这些发现,并揭示了不信任在预测竞争中战略信息共享和使用方面的作用。这些结果支持了一种关于群体决策的动机性信息处理方法。