Suppr超能文献

混合型与注意缺陷多动障碍多动冲动为主型:功能损害存在差异吗?

Combined type versus ADHD predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type: is there a difference in functional impairment?

作者信息

Riley Catherine, DuPaul George J, Pipan Mary, Kern Lee, Van Brakle John, Blum Nathan J

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Stony Brook University Medical Center, Stony Brook, New York 11794-8111, USA.

出版信息

J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2008 Aug;29(4):270-5. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e31816b6afe.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether preschool children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type (ADHD-HI) and ADHD combined type (ADHD-C) have different levels of functional impairment in four domains: externalizing (oppositional and disruptive) behaviors, internalizing (anxious) behaviors, social skills, and preacademic functioning.

METHODS

The subjects were 102 children 3 to 5 years of age, meeting DSM-IV criteria for ADHD. Children with ADHD-C versus ADHD-HI were compared across at least two measures for each of the four functional domains. Oppositional and anxious behaviors were assessed on the Conners Parent and Teacher Rating Scales. In addition, off-task and disruptive behaviors were assessed by direct observation in the preschool setting. Social skills were assessed on the parent and teacher versions of the Social Skills Rating System and preacademic skills were assessed on the letter word identification, passage comprehension, and applied problems subtests of the Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement and the initial sound fluency subtest of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills 5th Edition.

RESULTS

There were no significant differences between the groups on rating scale T scores for parent-reported oppositional symptoms (ADHD-C vs ADHD-HI; 66.7 +/- 13.5 vs 65.7 +/- 11.7; p = .73); parent-reported anxious symptoms (53.5 +/- 11.1 vs 53.2 +/- 9.7; p = .90); teacher-reported oppositional symptoms (70.9 +/- 15.6 vs 75.5 +/- 14.7; p = .17); or teacher reported anxious symptoms (59.2 +/- 11.6 vs 58.5 +/- 12.2; p = .77). No statistically significant differences were found between the groups when examining off-task and/or disruptive behavior during structured and free play observations at school. No significant differences between the subtypes were found for social skills or preacademic functioning.

CONCLUSIONS

Across the four areas of functioning assessed in this study, preschool children with ADHD-HI and those with ADHD-C demonstrated similar levels of functioning. This study, in combination with data from longitudinal studies demonstrating that most children with ADHD-HI are later diagnosed with ADHD-C, suggests that ADHD-HI may represent an earlier form of ADHD-C as opposed to a distinct subtype.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估以多动冲动为主型注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD-HI)和混合型注意力缺陷多动障碍(ADHD-C)的学龄前儿童在四个领域的功能损害水平是否存在差异:外化(对立和破坏)行为、内化(焦虑)行为、社交技能和学业前功能。

方法

研究对象为102名3至5岁符合ADHD的DSM-IV标准的儿童。对ADHD-C组和ADHD-HI组儿童在四个功能领域中的每个领域至少进行两项测量并进行比较。对立和焦虑行为通过康纳斯父母与教师评定量表进行评估。此外,在幼儿园环境中通过直接观察评估任务无关和破坏行为。社交技能通过社交技能评定系统的家长版和教师版进行评估,学业前技能通过伍德科克-约翰逊III成就测验的字母单词识别、段落理解和应用问题子测验以及《基础早期读写技能动态指标》第5版的首音流畅性子测验进行评估。

结果

两组在家长报告对立症状的评定量表T分数上无显著差异(ADHD-C组与ADHD-HI组;66.7±13.5对65.7±11.7;p = 0.73);家长报告焦虑症状(53.5±11.1对53.2±9.7;p = 0.90);教师报告对立症状(70.9±15.6对75.5±14.7;p = 0.17);或教师报告焦虑症状(59.2±11.6对58.5±12.2;p = 0.77)。在学校结构化和自由游戏观察期间检查任务无关和/或破坏行为时,两组之间未发现统计学上的显著差异。在社交技能或学业前功能方面,各亚型之间未发现显著差异。

结论

在本研究评估的四个功能领域中,ADHD-HI学龄前儿童和ADHD-C学龄前儿童表现出相似的功能水平。本研究与纵向研究数据相结合,表明大多数ADHD-HI儿童后来被诊断为ADHD-C,这表明ADHD-HI可能代表ADHD-C的早期形式,而非一种独特的亚型。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验