Segal Neil A, Torner James C, Yang Mei, Curtis Jeffrey R, Felson David T, Nevitt Michael C
Department of Orthopaedics & Rehabilitation, University of Iowa and VA Medical Center, Iowa City, IA 52242-1088, USA.
J Clin Densitom. 2008 Oct-Dec;11(4):503-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2008.03.001. Epub 2008 May 5.
This cross-sectional study examined whether reduced hip bone mineral density (BMD) is better explained by isokinetic knee extensor strength (KES), lower limb lean body mass (L-LBM), or Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). Through population-based recruitment, 1543 adults without knee osteoarthritis were recruited. For men and women respectively, means+/-SD were age 60.8+/-8.0 and 61.1+/-7.9 yr; body mass index 29.6+/-4.6 and 29.1+/-5.4 kg/m(2); hip BMD 1.025+/-0.138 and 0.895+/-0.128 g/cm(2); KES 124.9+/-41 and 72.7+/-22.9 N.m; L-LBM 10.3+/-1.5 and 7.0+/-1.2 kg; and PASE 206.4+/-99.7 and 163.8+/-77.0. The relationship between BMD and KES in men (r(2)=0.21, p> or =0.002) and women (r=0.23, p<0.001) was significant before adjustment. However, this association was no longer significant after controlling for L-LBM. Even after controlling for age, race, and sex, the association between BMD and KES was better explained by L-LBM (partial R(2)=0.14, p<0.001) than by PASE (partial R(2)=0.00). Allometric scaling of KES to body size attenuated the association of BMD with KES (Std Beta=0.03). The significant association between BMD and L-LBM (Std Beta=0.36) remained stronger than that between BMD and weight (Std Beta=0.21). Therefore, muscle mass accounted for a greater proportion of the variance in hip BMD than KES or activity level and explained a significant proportion of the association between weight and BMD.
这项横断面研究探讨了等速膝关节伸肌力量(KES)、下肢去脂体重(L-LBM)或老年人身体活动量表(PASE)是否能更好地解释髋部骨密度(BMD)降低的情况。通过基于人群的招募方式,招募了1543名无膝关节骨关节炎的成年人。男性和女性的平均年龄±标准差分别为60.8±8.0岁和61.1±7.9岁;体重指数分别为29.6±4.6和29.1±5.4kg/m²;髋部骨密度分别为1.025±0.138和0.895±0.128g/cm²;KES分别为124.9±41和72.7±22.9N·m;L-LBM分别为10.3±1.5和7.0±1.2kg;PASE分别为206.4±99.7和163.8±77.0。调整前,男性(r² = 0.21,p≥0.002)和女性(r = 0.23,p<0.001)的骨密度与KES之间的关系显著。然而,在控制L-LBM后,这种关联不再显著。即使在控制了年龄、种族和性别后,骨密度与KES之间的关联由L-LBM(偏R² = 0.14,p<0.001)解释的程度比由PASE(偏R² = 0.00)解释的程度更好。将KES按体表面积进行缩放减弱了骨密度与KES之间的关联(标准化β = 0.03)。骨密度与L-LBM之间的显著关联(标准化β = 0.36)仍然比骨密度与体重之间的关联(标准化β = 0.21)更强。因此,肌肉质量在髋部骨密度变异中所占比例比KES或活动水平更大,并且解释了体重与骨密度之间关联的很大一部分。