Jaric Slobodan
Centre for Musculo-Skeletal Research, National Institute for Working Life, Umea, Sweden.
Sports Med. 2002;32(10):615-31. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200232100-00002.
Assessment of muscle strength tests has been a popular form of testing muscle function in sports and exercises, as well as in other movement-related sciences for several decades. Although the relationship between muscle strength and body size has attracted considerable attention from researchers, this relationship has been often either neglected or incorrectly taken into account when presenting the results from muscle strength tests. Two specific problems have been identified. First, most of the studies have presented strength data either non-normalised for body size, or normalised using inappropriate methods, or even several different normalisations have been applied on the same sets of data. Second, the role of body size in various movement performances has been neglected when functional movement performance was assessed by muscle strength. As a consequence, muscle function, athletic profiles, or functional movement performance assessed by tested muscle strength have been often confounded by the effect of body size. Differences in the normalisation methods applied also do not allow for comparison of the data obtained in different studies. Using the following allometric formula for obtaining index of muscle strength, S, independent of body size (assessed by body mass, m) should be recommended in routine strength testing procedures: The allometric parameter should be either b = 0.67 for muscle force (recorded by a dynamometer), or b = 1 for muscle torque (recorded by an isokinetic apparatus). We also recommend using body-size-independent indices of both muscle strength and movement performance when assessing functional performance from recorded muscle strength or vice versa.
几十年来,肌肉力量测试评估一直是体育、运动以及其他与运动相关科学领域中检测肌肉功能的一种常用形式。尽管肌肉力量与身体大小之间的关系已引起研究人员的广泛关注,但在呈现肌肉力量测试结果时,这种关系常常被忽视或错误地考虑在内。已发现两个具体问题。首先,大多数研究呈现的力量数据要么未针对身体大小进行标准化,要么使用了不恰当的方法进行标准化,甚至对同一组数据应用了几种不同的标准化方法。其次,在通过肌肉力量评估功能运动表现时,身体大小在各种运动表现中的作用被忽视了。因此,通过测试肌肉力量评估的肌肉功能、运动特征或功能运动表现常常因身体大小的影响而混淆。所应用的标准化方法的差异也使得不同研究中获得的数据无法进行比较。在常规力量测试程序中,建议使用以下异速生长公式来获取与身体大小无关的肌肉力量指数S(通过体重m评估身体大小):对于肌肉力量(由测力计记录),异速生长参数应为b = 0.67;对于肌肉扭矩(由等动装置记录),异速生长参数应为b = 1。我们还建议,在根据记录的肌肉力量评估功能表现或反之亦然时,使用与身体大小无关的肌肉力量和运动表现指数。