VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle, WA, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Aug;23(8):1246-56. doi: 10.1007/s11606-008-0563-7. Epub 2008 May 6.
Identify and describe interventions to reduce time to reperfusion for patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI).
Key word searches of five research databases: MEDLINE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Clinical Trials Registry.
We included controlled and uncontrolled studies of interventions to reduce time to reperfusion. One researcher reviewed abstracts and 2 reviewed full text articles. Articles were subsequently abstracted into structured data tables, which included study design, setting, intervention, and outcome variables. We inductively developed intervention categories from the articles. A second researcher reviewed data abstraction for accuracy.
We identified 666 articles, 42 of which met inclusion criteria. We identified 11 intervention categories and classified them as either process specific (e.g., emergency department administration of thrombolytic therapy, activation of the catheterization laboratory by emergency department personnel) or system level (e.g., continuous quality improvement, critical pathways). A majority of studies (59%) were single-site pre/post design, and nearly half (47%) had sample sizes less than 100 patients. Thirty-two studies (76%) reported significantly lower door to reperfusion times associated with an intervention, 12 (29%) of which met or exceeded guideline recommended times. Relative decreases in times to reperfusion ranged from 15 to 82% for door to needle and 13-64% for door to balloon.
We identified an array of process and system-based quality improvement interventions associated with significant improvements in door to reperfusion time. However, weak study designs and inadequate information about implementation limit the usefulness of this literature.
确定并描述可缩短 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者再灌注时间的干预措施。
在 5 个研究数据库(MEDLINE、护理学及相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)、EMBASE、Web of Science 和 Cochrane 临床试验注册中心)中进行关键词检索。
我们纳入了旨在缩短再灌注时间的干预措施的对照和非对照研究。1 位研究人员浏览了摘要,2 位研究人员浏览了全文文章。随后,将文章摘要为结构化数据表,其中包括研究设计、地点、干预措施和结局变量。我们从文章中归纳出干预类别。另一位研究人员对数据提取的准确性进行了审查。
我们共检索到 666 篇文章,其中 42 篇符合纳入标准。我们确定了 11 个干预类别,并将其分为过程特定类别(例如,急诊科给予溶栓治疗,急诊科人员激活导管室)或系统水平类别(例如,持续质量改进,关键路径)。大多数研究(59%)为单站点前后设计,近一半(47%)的样本量小于 100 例患者。32 项研究(76%)报告称,干预措施与再灌注时间明显缩短相关,其中 12 项(29%)达到或超过了指南推荐的时间。门到再灌注时间的相对缩短范围为门到针 15%82%,门到球囊 13%64%。
我们发现了一系列基于过程和系统的质量改进干预措施,这些措施与再灌注时间的显著缩短相关。然而,研究设计薄弱且缺乏有关实施情况的信息,限制了该文献的实用性。