Li Xingshan, Cave Kyle R, Wolfe Jeremy M
University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts 01003, USA.
Percept Psychophys. 2008 Apr;70(3):477-88. doi: 10.3758/pp.70.3.477.
We used visual search to explore whether attention could be guided by Kanizsa-type subjective contours and by subjective contours induced by line ends. Unlike in previous experiments, we compared search performance with subjective contours against performance with real, luminance contours, and we had observers search for orientations or shapes produced by subjective contours, rather than searching for the presence of the contours themselves. Visual search for one orientation or shape among distractors of another orientation or shape was efficient when the items were defined by luminance contours. Search was much less efficient among items defined by Kanizsa-type subjective contours. Search remained efficient when the items were defined by subjective contours induced by line ends. The difference between Kanizsa-type subjective contour and subjective contours induced by line ends is consistent with physiological evidence suggesting that the brain mechanisms underlying the perception of these two kinds of subjective contours may be different.
我们运用视觉搜索来探究注意力是否能够由卡尼兹萨型主观轮廓以及线端诱导的主观轮廓所引导。与先前的实验不同,我们将基于主观轮廓的搜索性能与基于真实亮度轮廓的性能进行了比较,并且让观察者搜索由主观轮廓产生的方向或形状,而非搜索轮廓本身的存在。当项目由亮度轮廓定义时,在其他方向或形状的干扰物中搜索某一方向或形状的视觉搜索是高效的。在由卡尼兹萨型主观轮廓定义的项目中,搜索效率则低得多。当项目由线端诱导的主观轮廓定义时,搜索仍然高效。卡尼兹萨型主观轮廓与线端诱导的主观轮廓之间的差异与生理学证据一致,这表明这两种主观轮廓感知背后的大脑机制可能有所不同。