Satisfaction with organizational aspects of health care provision among Lithuanian physicians.

BACKGROUND

Physician satisfaction is considered an important factor influencing quality of health care provision, patient compliance, and costs to health care systems. Dissatisfaction leads to an increase in turnover of physicians and early retirement, which has a negative impact on continuity and quality of health care. Physician dissatisfaction with certain aspects of health care provision may also help to identify potential weaknesses in satisfactory functioning of health care systems. The aim of the current research project is to study the satisfaction with different organizational aspects of health care provision in Lithuania as judged by a selection of physicians.

METHOD

The study was conducted in Lithuania in June 2004. Physicians in randomly selected health care centers were invited to take part in the survey, 505 primary and secondary care physicians were interviewed by external interviewers during the study period. Physicians were asked to express their satisfaction on items presented in a questionnaire. The questionnaire consisted of 22 questions, evaluating different aspects of health care services - working conditions, workload, financial remuneration, organization of health care infrastructure and availability of laboratory services. Answers were presented by the 5 point Likert type scale, ranging from "very satisfied" (5) to "very dissatisfied" (1).

RESULTS

Physicians who were most satisfied with their working conditions were working in private primary health care practices (91.1% satisfied or very satisfied), as compared with 54% of physicians working in state-owned primary care institutions and 49.7% in hospitals. Physicians working in cities and regional centers or towns were more satisfied with organizational aspects of health care services than physicians working in rural health care centers. Satisfaction with their financial remuneration showed that 74% of respondents stated they were "dissatisfied" or "very dissatisfied". While asked about potential deficiencies in their health care institutions, the most important identified by respondents in all localities was a perceived lack of financial support for these institutions.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a significant difference in the perception of physicians in private and state health care institutions with regard to financial remuneration as well as availability of laboratory diagnostic and treatment equipment and working conditions. Based on the study findings, possibilities to increase Primary Care financing should be considered in order to improve the quality of the delivery of health care services as well as retain physicians within the health care system. Results of this study demonstrate a need of further research to quantify what could be reasonably expected from diagnostic and investigative resources to support health care in Lithuania in current economic situation.