Suppr超能文献

碘化造影剂与对比剂肾病:是否存在首选的性价比高的药物?

Iodinated contrast media and contrast-induced nephropathy: is there a preferred cost-effective agent?

作者信息

Sharma Samin K

机构信息

Mount Sinai Hospital, Box 1030, One Gustave Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029-6574, USA.

出版信息

J Invasive Cardiol. 2008 May;20(5):245-8.

Abstract

Over 20 years have passed since the introduction of the tri-iodinated low-osmolar nonionic contrast agents such as iopamidol, iohexol, ioversol and iopromide. During this time, most cardiology practices have switched to these nonionic agents to avoid the nuisance side effects and cardiac adverse events associated with the older ionic contrast agents. Although the improved tolerability of the nonionic agents is generally attributed to their decreased osmolality (approximately half that of the older ionic contrast agents), in fact, these contrast agents also differ from the older agents in their ionicity, viscosity and direct chemotoxicity. The impact of these properties on safety, together with cost differences, should be considered when selecting a contrast agent.

摘要

自引入三碘低渗非离子型造影剂(如碘帕醇、碘海醇、碘佛醇和碘普罗胺)以来,已经过去了20多年。在此期间,大多数心脏病学实践已改用这些非离子型造影剂,以避免与旧的离子型造影剂相关的烦人的副作用和心脏不良事件。尽管非离子型造影剂耐受性的提高通常归因于其渗透压降低(约为旧离子型造影剂的一半),但实际上,这些造影剂在离子性、粘度和直接化学毒性方面也与旧造影剂不同。在选择造影剂时,应考虑这些特性对安全性的影响以及成本差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验