Stewart Ian, Seawright Alan A, Shaw Glen R
National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2008;619:613-37. doi: 10.1007/978-0-387-75865-7_28.
Poisoning of livestock by toxic cyanobacteria was first reported in the 19th century, and throughout the 20th century cyanobacteria-related poisonings of livestock and wildlife in all continents have been described. Some mass mortality events involving unrelated fauna in prehistoric times have also been attributed to cyanotoxin poisoning; if correct, this serves as a reminder that toxic cyanobacteria blooms predate anthropogenic manipulation of the environment, though there is probably general agreement that human intervention has led to increases in the frequency and extent of cyanobacteria blooms. Many of the early reports of cyanobacteria poisoning were anecdotal and circumstantial, albeit with good descriptions of the appearance and behaviour of cyanobacteria blooms that preceded or coincided with illness and death in exposed animals. Early necropsy findings of hepatotoxicity were subsequently confirmed by experimental investigations. More recent reports supplement clinical and post-mortem findings with investigative chemistry techniques to identify cyanotoxins in stomach contents and tissue fluids.
家畜因有毒蓝藻中毒最早于19世纪被报道,在整个20世纪,各大洲都有关于家畜和野生动物与蓝藻相关中毒事件的描述。一些史前时期涉及不相关动物的大规模死亡事件也被归因于蓝藻毒素中毒;如果这是正确的,这提醒人们有毒蓝藻水华早于人类对环境的人为操纵出现,不过人们普遍认为人类干预导致了蓝藻水华的频率和范围增加。许多早期关于蓝藻中毒的报告都是轶事性和间接性的,尽管对暴露动物发病和死亡之前或同时出现的蓝藻水华的外观和行为有很好的描述。早期肝毒性的尸检结果随后通过实验研究得到证实。最近的报告用调查化学技术补充了临床和尸检结果,以鉴定胃内容物和组织液中的蓝藻毒素。