Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Trg Dositeja Obradovića 3, 21000, Novi Sad, Serbia.
Biochemistry, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Åbo Akademi University, Turku, Finland.
Arch Toxicol. 2019 Sep;93(9):2429-2481. doi: 10.1007/s00204-019-02524-4. Epub 2019 Jul 26.
Cyanobacteria are photoautotrophic organisms which occur in aquatic and terrestrial environments. They have the potential to produce toxins which pose a threat to human and animal health. This review covers the global distribution of the common cyanotoxins and related poisoning cases. A total of 468 selected articles on toxic cyanobacteria, dating from the earliest records until 2018, were reviewed. Most of the articles were published after 2000 (72%; 337 out of 468), which is consistent with the recent growth in interest in the analysis, toxinology and ecotoxicology of cyanotoxins. Animal and/or human poisoning cases were described in more than a third of the overall publications (38%; 177 out of 468). The reviewed publications showed that there were 1118 recorded identifications of major cyanotoxins in 869 freshwater ecosystems from 66 countries throughout the world. Microcystins were the most often recorded cyanotoxins worldwide (63%; 699 out of 1118), followed by cylindrospermopsin (10%; 107 out of 1118), anatoxins (9%; 100 out of 1118), and saxitoxins (8%; 93 out of 1118). Nodularins were the most rarely recorded cyanotoxins (2%; 19 out of 1118); however, there were also reports where cyanotoxins were not analysed or specified (9%; 100 out of 1118). The most commonly found toxic cyanobacterial genera were Microcystis spp. (669 reports), Anabaena spp. (397 reports), Aphanizomenon spp. (100 reports), Planktothrix spp. (98 reports), and Oscillatoria spp. (75 reports). Furthermore, there were 183 recorded cyanotoxin poisonings of humans and/or animals. Out of all toxic cyanobacterial blooms reviewed in this paper, the highest percentage of associated poisonings was found in North and Central America (39%; 69 cases out of 179), then Europe (20%; 35 out of 179), Australia including New Zealand (15%; 27 out of 179), and Africa (11%; 20 out of 179), while the lowest percentage was related to Asia (8%; 14 cases out of 179) and South America (8%; 14 cases out of 179). Events where only animals were known to have been affected were 63% (114 out of 182), whereas 32% (58 out of 182) of the investigated events involved only humans. A historical overview of human and animal poisoning episodes associated with cyanobacterial blooms is presented. Further, geographical data on the occurrence of cyanotoxins and related poisonings based on the available literature are shown. Some countries (mainly European) have done very intensive research on the occurrence of toxic cyanobacteria and cyanotoxins, and reported related ecotoxicological observations, while in some countries the lack of data is apparent. The true global extent of cyanotoxins and associated poisonings is likely to be greater than found in the available literature, and it can be assumed that ecotoxicological and hygienic problems caused by toxic cyanobacteria may occur in more environments.
蓝藻是在水生和陆地环境中存在的光合自养生物。它们有可能产生毒素,对人类和动物健康构成威胁。本综述涵盖了常见的蓝藻毒素及其相关中毒病例的全球分布情况。共回顾了自最早记录到 2018 年的 468 篇有关有毒蓝藻的选定文章。这些文章大多数是在 2000 年后发表的(72%;468 篇中的 337 篇),这与最近对蓝藻毒素的分析、毒理学和生态毒理学的兴趣增长一致。在总的出版物中,有超过三分之一(38%;468 篇中的 177 篇)描述了动物和/或人类中毒的病例。综述出版物表明,在全球 66 个国家的 869 个淡水生态系统中,共记录了 1118 种主要蓝藻毒素。微囊藻毒素是全球最常记录的蓝藻毒素(63%;1118 种中的 699 种),其次是节旋藻毒素(10%;1118 种中的 107 种)、anatoxins(9%;1118 种中的 100 种)和石房蛤毒素(8%;1118 种中的 93 种)。节旋藻毒素是记录最少的蓝藻毒素(2%;1118 种中的 19 种);然而,也有报告称,蓝藻毒素未被分析或指定(9%;1118 种中的 100 种)。最常发现的有毒蓝藻属是微囊藻属(669 份报告)、鱼腥藻属(397 份报告)、节旋藻属(100 份报告)、颤藻属(98 份报告)和束丝藻属(75 份报告)。此外,还记录了 183 例人类和/或动物的蓝藻毒素中毒病例。在本文综述的所有有毒蓝藻水华事件中,与中毒相关的百分比最高的是北美洲和中美洲(39%;179 例中的 69 例),其次是欧洲(20%;179 例中的 35 例)、澳大利亚(包括新西兰)(15%;179 例中的 27 例)和非洲(11%;179 例中的 20 例),而与亚洲(8%;179 例中的 14 例)和南美洲(8%;179 例中的 14 例)相关的中毒病例比例最低。仅已知动物受到影响的事件占 63%(114 例),而涉及人类的事件占 32%(58 例)。本文介绍了与蓝藻水华有关的人类和动物中毒事件的历史概述。此外,还根据现有文献展示了有关蓝藻毒素和相关中毒的地理数据。一些国家(主要是欧洲国家)对有毒蓝藻和蓝藻毒素的发生情况进行了非常深入的研究,并报告了相关的生态毒理学观察结果,而在一些国家,数据明显缺乏。蓝藻毒素和相关中毒的真实全球范围可能比现有文献中发现的更大,可以假设有毒蓝藻可能会在更多环境中引发生态毒理学和卫生问题。