Bettini R, Mantovani W, Boninsegna L, Crippa S, Capelli P, Bassi C, Scarpa A, Pederzoli P, Falconi M
Department of Surgery, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Dig Liver Dis. 2009 Jan;41(1):49-55. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2008.03.015. Epub 2008 May 7.
The role of debulking surgery in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinomas (M-NF-PECs) with resectable primary tumour and unresectable liver metastases is debated.
Aim of the study is to evaluate whether the resection of the primary tumour in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinoma improves survival.
Fifty-one metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinoma patients with unresectable liver metastases were enrolled from 1990 to 2004 at the time of diagnosis. Nineteen patients underwent complete resection of the primary tumour whilst 32 were judged unresectable. All cases were classified according to the WHO 2000 classification. All clinico-pathological parameters, including grade of differentiation and the Ki-67 proliferation index were considered in univariate and multivariate models.
Of the 19 resected patients, 14 (73.7%) underwent left-pancreatectomy and 5 (26.3%) pancreaticoduodenectomy. In the unresected group of 32 patients, 9 (28.1%) underwent surgical biliary and/or gastric by-pass. There was no postoperative mortality and the median survival was 54.3 months (95% CI: 25.7-82.9). No difference in survival was observed between the two groups [resected: median 54.3 months (95% CI: 25-83.6), unresected: median 39.5 months (95% CI: 5.4-73.6); p=0.74]. Upon multivariate analysis poor differentiation (HR 3.01; 95% CI 1.08-8.4; p=0.035) and a Ki-67 index > or = 10% (HR 4.4; 95% CI 1.2-16.1; p=0.023) were significant predictors of survival.
Resection of the primary pancreatic tumour in metastatic nonfunctioning pancreatic endocrine carcinoma patients with unresectable liver metastases does not significantly improve survival. Resection can be considered as symptomatic palliative therapy in patients with well-differentiated endocrine carcinomas and a proliferative index lower than 10%.
对于可切除原发肿瘤但不可切除肝转移灶的转移性无功能性胰腺内分泌癌(M-NF-PECs),减瘤手术的作用存在争议。
本研究旨在评估转移性无功能性胰腺内分泌癌患者切除原发肿瘤是否能提高生存率。
1990年至2004年期间,共纳入51例诊断时伴有不可切除肝转移灶的转移性无功能性胰腺内分泌癌患者。19例患者接受了原发肿瘤的完整切除,32例被判定为不可切除。所有病例均根据世界卫生组织2000年分类法进行分类。在单因素和多因素模型中考虑了所有临床病理参数,包括分化程度和Ki-67增殖指数。
在19例接受切除的患者中,14例(73.7%)接受了左胰切除术,5例(26.3%)接受了胰十二指肠切除术。在32例未接受切除的患者组中,9例(28.1%)接受了外科胆管和/或胃旁路手术。无术后死亡病例,中位生存期为54.3个月(95%置信区间:25.7 - 82.9)。两组之间未观察到生存差异[接受切除者:中位生存期54.3个月(95%置信区间:25 - 83.6);未接受切除者:中位生存期39.5个月(95%置信区间:5.4 - 73.6);p = 0.74]。多因素分析显示,低分化(风险比3.01;95%置信区间1.08 - 8.4;p = 0.035)和Ki-67指数≥10%(风险比4.4;95%置信区间1.2 - 16.1;p = 0.023)是生存的显著预测因素。
对于伴有不可切除肝转移灶的转移性无功能性胰腺内分泌癌患者,切除原发胰腺肿瘤并不能显著提高生存率。对于高分化内分泌癌且增殖指数低于10%的患者,可考虑将切除作为对症姑息治疗。