Suppr超能文献

ISIS-DME:一项针对难治性糖尿病性黄斑水肿的前瞻性、随机、剂量递增玻璃体内注射类固醇研究。

ISIS-DME: a prospective, randomized, dose-escalation intravitreal steroid injection study for refractory diabetic macular edema.

作者信息

Kim Judy E, Pollack John S, Miller David G, Mittra Robert A, Spaide Richard F

机构信息

Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, USA.

出版信息

Retina. 2008 May;28(5):735-40. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0b013e318163194c.

Abstract

PURPOSE

: To determine safety and efficacy of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) for refractory clinically significant diabetic macular edema (DME).

DESIGN

: Prospective, randomized, dose-escalation pilot study comparing single injection of 2 mg versus 4 mg doses of IVTA.

METHODS

: Inclusion criteria included clinically significant DME persisting >/=3 months after maximal laser treatment and visual acuity </=20/40. Best-corrected ETDRS vision, intraocular pressure, presence of DME, and fluorescein angiography (FA) were evaluated at 3 months and 6 months after injection.

RESULTS

: Mean change in visual acuity at 3 months compared to baseline was 7.1 letters (P = 0.01) in the 2 mg group and 12.5 letters in the 4 mg group (P < 0.0001). However, there was not a significant difference in visual improvement between the 2 mg and 4 mg dose groups (P = 0.11). Vision improved >15 letters at 3 months in 23% (3/13) of 2 mg group and in 33% (5/15) of 4 mg group (P = 0.69), and 0% (0/11) and 21% (3/14) at 6 months, respectively (P = 0.23). Visual improvement was more likely in cystoid-type DME than diffuse DME. Intraocular pressure rise of >/=10 mmHg occurred in 19% (3/16) of 2 mg group and 41% (7/17) of 4 mg group.

CONCLUSIONS

: Both doses of IVTA were well tolerated and had significant positive effects on refractory DME for short term. There were consistent trends throughout the study that suggest that a 4 mg IVTA may be more effective than a 2 mg dose. The benefit of IVTA was greater for cystoid-type DME.

摘要

目的

确定玻璃体内注射曲安奈德(IVTA)治疗难治性临床显著性糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)的安全性和有效性。

设计

前瞻性、随机、剂量递增的试点研究,比较单次注射2毫克与4毫克剂量的IVTA。

方法

纳入标准包括在最大程度激光治疗后持续≥3个月的临床显著性DME且视力≤20/40。在注射后3个月和6个月评估最佳矫正ETDRS视力、眼压、DME的存在情况以及荧光素血管造影(FA)。

结果

与基线相比,2毫克组在3个月时视力平均变化为7.1个字母(P = 0.01),4毫克组为12.5个字母(P < 0.0001)。然而,2毫克和4毫克剂量组之间的视力改善没有显著差异(P = 0.11)。2毫克组23%(3/13)的患者在3个月时视力改善>15个字母,4毫克组为33%(5/15)(P = 0.69),6个月时分别为0%(0/11)和21%(3/14)(P = 0.23)。囊样型DME比弥漫型DME更有可能出现视力改善。2毫克组19%(3/16)和4毫克组41%(7/17)出现眼压升高≥10 mmHg。

结论

两种剂量的IVTA耐受性良好,对难治性DME短期内有显著的积极作用。整个研究中有一致的趋势表明,4毫克IVTA可能比2毫克剂量更有效。IVTA对囊样型DME的益处更大。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验