Save Sight Institute, Department of Clinical Ophthalmology, The University of Sydney, Sydney Eye Hospitals, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2010 May;51(5):2322-8. doi: 10.1167/iovs.09-4400. Epub 2009 Dec 17.
To determine whether pretreatment with intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) before laser photocoagulation is effective in eyes with diabetic macular edema (DME).
The study was a prospective, double-masked, placebo-controlled, clinical trial of eyes with DME and impaired vision (<or=20/40) randomized to IVTA 4 mg versus placebo 6 weeks before laser treatment. The main outcome measure was the proportion of eyes with improvement of best-corrected logarithm of minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) visual acuity of >or=5 letters after 6 months. Secondary outcomes were necessity of further treatment, change in central macular thickness, and incidence of adverse events.
Eighty-four eyes of 54 participants were entered into the study, with 6-month data available for 81 (96%) of 84 eyes. Improvement of >or=5 logMAR letters was similar in eyes treated with IVTA before laser as placebo (18/42 [43%] IVTA vs. 16/34 [38%] laser alone; P = 0.807), as were retreatment rates at 6 months (22 [56%] IVTA vs. 21 [53%] laser alone; P = 0.727). Mean central macular thickness decreased by 50 microm (95% confidence interval, 10-96 microm) more in the IVTA treatment group than in the laser-alone group after 6 months (P = 0.016). Glaucoma therapy was necessary more frequently in IVTA-treated eyes than in those treated with laser alone (19/42 [45%] vs. 7/42 [17%]; P = 0.005).
Visual results and the need for further laser treatment at 6 months were no better in the IVTA group than in the laser-alone group, despite a better anatomic outcome reflected by reduction in mean central macular thickness. This study found no evidence of a synergistic effect of IVTA and laser photocoagulation for DME. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00148265).
观察糖尿病黄斑水肿(DME)患者激光光凝治疗前玻璃体腔内曲安奈德(IVTA)预处理的疗效。
前瞻性、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验,DME 伴视力下降(<或=20/40)患者随机分为 IVTA 4mg 组和安慰剂组,6 周后行激光治疗。主要观察指标为治疗后 6 个月最佳矫正视力对数最小分辨角视力(logMAR)提高≥5 个字母的眼比例。次要观察指标为是否需要进一步治疗、黄斑中心厚度(CMT)变化及不良反应发生率。
54 例患者 84 只眼进入本研究,81 只眼(96%)完成 6 个月随访。IVTA 预处理组和激光组治疗后 logMAR 视力提高≥5 个字母的眼比例相似(IVTA 组 18/42[43%],激光组 16/34[38%];P=0.807),6 个月时再次治疗率相似(IVTA 组 22/42[56%],激光组 21/34[53%];P=0.727)。IVTA 治疗组治疗后 6 个月 CMT 平均降低 50μm(95%可信区间:10~96μm;P=0.016)。IVTA 治疗组需要抗青光眼治疗的眼多于激光组(IVTA 组 19/42[45%],激光组 7/42[17%];P=0.005)。
尽管 IVTA 治疗降低了平均 CMT,但 6 个月时 IVTA 组与激光组的视力结果和再次激光治疗的需要并无差异。本研究未发现 IVTA 和激光光凝治疗 DME 有协同作用。(ClinicalTrials.gov 注册号:NCT00148265)