Eyangoh S I, Torrea G, Tejiokem M C, Kamdem Y, Piam F F, Noeske J, Van Deun A
Laboratoire des Mycobactéries, Laboratoire de Référence pour le PNLT, Centre Pasteur du Cameroun, BP 1274, Yaoundé, Cameroon.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2008 Sep;27(9):849-55. doi: 10.1007/s10096-008-0516-4. Epub 2008 May 8.
Bleach sputum concentration and fluorescence microscopy (FM) are reportedly more sensitive than direct Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) sputum smears for tuberculosis detection, and might be particularly valuable for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive patients excreting fewer bacilli. This study, implemented in Yaoundé, Cameroon, determined the yield from both direct and bleach-concentrated FM and ZN duplicate smears against culture on Löwenstein-Jensen medium, with HIV testing from the sputa. From 418 HIV-positive and 518 HIV-negative tuberculosis suspects, 185 (44.3%) and 243 (46.9%) cultures, respectively, grew Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Direct ZN was positive for, respectively, 87 (47.0%) and 202 (83.1%) of the culture-positive cases. Proportional incremental yield over direct ZN from ZN and FM bleach smears was 14.9% (P < 10(-3)) and 17.2% (P < 10(-4)) for HIV-positive versus 4.9% (P < 10(-2)) and 2.0% (non-significant) for HIV-negative cases. There was no gain from direct FM. Bleach FM showed 2% excess false positives. The bleach concentration, therefore, increases the yield of ZN and FM, particularly from HIV-positive patients, but with a higher risk for false positives with bleach FM. With excellent baseline direct ZN, the gain remains modest. Field studies under real-life conditions are needed to determine whether it is worth the risks and operational challenges in HIV high-prevalence populations. FM was not more sensitive than ZN in this study, probably because of sub-optimal objective power and background staining. Culture on solid media with sparing laurylsulfate decontamination was clearly superior for HIV-positives, but it remains to be seen if culture also leads to more cases started on treatment routinely.
据报道,漂白剂浓缩痰液检测和荧光显微镜检查(FM)在结核病检测方面比直接萋尼(ZN)痰液涂片更敏感,对于排出杆菌较少的人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)阳性患者可能特别有价值。本研究在喀麦隆雅温得开展,通过对来自痰液的HIV检测,确定了直接涂片、漂白剂浓缩后的FM涂片和ZN涂片双份样本相对于罗氏培养基培养的检出率。在418例HIV阳性和518例HIV阴性的结核病疑似患者中,分别有185例(44.3%)和243例(46.9%)培养出结核分枝杆菌。直接ZN涂片在培养阳性病例中分别为87例(47.0%)和202例(83.1%)呈阳性。与直接ZN涂片相比,ZN和FM漂白涂片的比例增量检出率在HIV阳性患者中分别为14.9%(P < 10⁻³)和17.2%(P < 10⁻⁴),而在HIV阴性患者中分别为4.9%(P < 10⁻²)和2.0%(无统计学意义)。直接FM涂片无增益。漂白剂FM显示出2%的额外假阳性。因此,漂白剂浓缩提高了ZN和FM的检出率,特别是在HIV阳性患者中,但漂白剂FM出现假阳性的风险更高。在直接ZN涂片基线良好的情况下,增益仍然有限。需要在实际生活条件下进行现场研究,以确定在HIV高流行人群中这样做是否值得承担风险和应对操作挑战。在本研究中,FM并不比ZN更敏感,可能是因为物镜放大倍数不理想和背景染色的原因。使用少量月桂基硫酸盐净化的固体培养基培养对于HIV阳性患者明显更优,但常规培养是否也能导致更多病例开始治疗仍有待观察。