Wesolowski Laura G, MacKellar Duncan A, Facente Shelley N, Dowling Teri, Ethridge Steven F, Zhu Julia H, Sullivan Patrick S
Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, National Center for HIV, STD and TB Prevention, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
AIDS. 2006 Aug 1;20(12):1661-6. doi: 10.1097/01.aids.0000238413.13442.ed.
Post-marketing surveillance was conducted to monitor the performance of the OraQuick Advance rapid HIV-1/2 antibody test (OraQuick) on whole blood and oral fluid.
Surveillance of routinely collected data on clients tested with OraQuick in 368 testing sites affiliated with 17 state and city health departments between 11 August 2004 and 30 June 2005.
For whole blood and oral fluid, we report the median (range) health department OraQuick specificity and positive predictive value (PPV), and the number of clients with discordant results (e.g. who had a reactive rapid test not confirmed positive by Western blot or indirect immunofluorescence). At one site with lower than expected oral-fluid specificity, we evaluated whether device expiration, manufacturing lot, operator practices, or device-storage or testing-area temperatures were associated with false-positive tests.
During the surveillance period, 135 724 whole blood and 26 066 oral fluid rapid tests were conducted. The median health department whole blood OraQuick specificity was 99.98% (range: 99.73-100%) and PPV was 99.24% (range: 66.67-100%); the median oral fluid specificity was 99.89% (range: 99.44-100%) and PPV was 90.00% (range: 50.00-100%). A total of 124 discordant results were reported from 68 (0.05%) whole blood and 56 (0.22%) oral fluid rapid tests. The oral fluid specificity at the site with excess oral fluid false-positive tests was 98.7% (95% confidence interval: 98.18-99.11%). The increase in false-positive tests at that site was not associated with any specific device characteristic, operator procedure or temperature condition.
The specificity of OraQuick performed on whole blood and oral fluid during post-marketing surveillance was compatible with the manufacturer's claim within the package insert. However, one site experienced lower than expected oral fluid specificity. Sites that observe that the specificity of OraQuick is lower than the range indicated in the package insert should notify the manufacturer and evaluate quality assurance procedures.
开展上市后监测,以监测奥芮柯快速HIV-1/2抗体检测试剂(OraQuick)在全血和口腔液中的性能表现。
对2004年8月11日至2005年6月30日期间,在17个州和市卫生部门下属的368个检测点使用OraQuick检测的客户的常规收集数据进行监测。
对于全血和口腔液检测,我们报告了卫生部门OraQuick的特异性中位数(范围)和阳性预测值(PPV),以及结果不一致的客户数量(例如,快速检测呈反应性但未通过蛋白免疫印迹法或间接免疫荧光法确认为阳性的客户)。在一个口腔液特异性低于预期的检测点,我们评估了试剂过期时间、生产批次、操作人员操作、试剂储存或检测区域温度是否与假阳性检测有关。
在监测期间,共进行了135724次全血和26066次口腔液快速检测。卫生部门全血OraQuick特异性中位数为99.98%(范围:99.73 - 100%),PPV为99.24%(范围:66.67 - 100%);口腔液特异性中位数为99.89%(范围:99.44 - 100%),PPV为90.00%(范围:50.00 - 100%)。在68次(0.05%)全血和56次(0.22%)口腔液快速检测中,共报告了124例结果不一致的情况。口腔液假阳性检测过多的检测点的口腔液特异性为98.7%(95%置信区间:98.18 - 99.11%)。该检测点假阳性检测的增加与任何特定的试剂特征、操作人员操作程序或温度条件均无关。
上市后监测期间,OraQuick在全血和口腔液检测中的特异性与制造商在产品说明书中的声明相符。然而,有一个检测点的口腔液特异性低于预期。观察到OraQuick特异性低于产品说明书中所示范围的检测点应通知制造商并评估质量保证程序。