Suppr超能文献

16 排多层螺旋 CT 血管造影术检测与评估颅内动脉瘤:与传统血管造影术的比较

Detection and evaluation of intracranial aneurysms with 16-row multislice CT angiography: comparison with conventional angiography.

作者信息

Uysal Ender, Oztora Fatma, Ozel Alper, Erturk Sukru Mehmet, Yildirim Hakan, Basak Muzaffer

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Sisli Etfal training and Research Hospital, Sisli, Istanbul, Turkey.

出版信息

Emerg Radiol. 2008 Sep;15(5):311-6. doi: 10.1007/s10140-008-0727-0. Epub 2008 May 8.

Abstract

The aim of our study was to compare multidetector row computed tomography (CT) angiography (MDCTA) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms. Between September 2005 and May 2007, 55 consecutive patients with suspected intracranial aneurysms underwent conventional DSA and MDCTA. Thirty-two women and 23 men were enrolled in the study. The mean patient age was 54 (range = 26-79 years). All MDCTA and DSA images were independently evaluated on a workstation by two radiologists, who had 8 and 6 years of experience in CT vascular imaging and angiography. Using DSA as the gold standard, the sensitivity and specificity of CT angiography was calculated for each reader with 95% confidence intervals. The sensitivity was also calculated for aneurysms smaller than 3 mm with 95% confidence intervals. The agreement between the readers for detecting aneurysms was calculated using kappa statistics. A kappa statistic greater than 0.75 was considered an excellent agreement beyond chance, a kappa statistic of 0.4-0.75, fair to good agreement, and a kappa statistic less than 0.4, poor agreement. At DSA, 64 aneurysms were present in 50 patients involved in the study; seven patients had two aneurysms each, and four patients had three aneurysms each. In five patients, no aneurysm was detected by using MDCTA and DSA, and evaluations were considered as true negative by MDCTA. These five patients also had negative findings at repeat DSA. For readers 1 and 2, the sensitivity of MDCT in detecting aneursyms were 96.9% (95% CI = 89.3-99.1%; 62 of 64) and 98.4 % (95% CI = 91.7-99.7%; 63 of 64), respectively. The spescificity was100% (95% CI = 99.7-100%; 1,256 of 1,256) for both readers. The kappa value indicating interobserver agreement was in the category of excellent (kappa = 0.99 (95% CI = 0.97-1). Regarding the aneurysms smaller than 3 mm, for readers 1 and 2, the sensitivities were 84.6% (95% CI = 57.8-95.7%; 11 of 13) and 92.3% (95% CI = 66.7-98.6; 12 of 13), respectively. MDCTA is accurate in the detection and characterization of intracranial aneurysms and can be used as a reliable alternative imaging technique to DSA. A strategy of using CT angiography as the primary method, with DSA reserved for any cases of uncertainty, appears safe and reliable.

摘要

我们研究的目的是比较多排螺旋计算机断层扫描(CT)血管造影(MDCTA)与数字减影血管造影(DSA)在颅内动脉瘤检测及特征描述方面的差异。2005年9月至2007年5月期间,55例连续怀疑患有颅内动脉瘤的患者接受了传统DSA和MDCTA检查。研究纳入了32名女性和23名男性。患者的平均年龄为54岁(范围 = 26 - 79岁)。所有MDCTA和DSA图像均由两位放射科医生在工作站上独立评估,他们分别在CT血管成像和血管造影方面有8年和6年的经验。以DSA作为金标准,计算每位阅片者CT血管造影的敏感性和特异性,并给出95%置信区间。对于直径小于3mm的动脉瘤,同样计算其敏感性及95%置信区间。使用kappa统计量计算阅片者之间在检测动脉瘤方面的一致性。kappa统计量大于0.75被认为是超出偶然因素的极佳一致性,kappa统计量在0.4 - 0.75之间为中等至良好一致性,kappa统计量小于0.4为差的一致性。在DSA检查中,研究涉及的50例患者共发现64个动脉瘤;7例患者各有2个动脉瘤,4例患者各有3个动脉瘤。5例患者经MDCTA和DSA检查均未发现动脉瘤,MDCTA评估为真阴性。这5例患者在重复DSA检查时也为阴性结果。对于阅片者1和阅片者2,MDCT检测动脉瘤的敏感性分别为96.9%(95% CI = 89.3 - 99.1%;64个中的62个)和98.4%(95% CI = 91.7 - 99.7%;64个中的63个)。两位阅片者的特异性均为100%(95% CI = 99.7 - 100%;1256个中的1256个)。表明观察者间一致性的kappa值属于极佳类别(kappa = 0.99(95% CI = 0.97 - 1))。对于直径小于3mm的动脉瘤,阅片者1和阅片者2的敏感性分别为84.6%(95% CI = 57.8 - 95.7%;13个中的11个)和92.3%(95% CI = 66.7 - 98.6%;13个中的12个)。MDCTA在颅内动脉瘤的检测及特征描述方面准确,可作为DSA可靠的替代成像技术。将CT血管造影作为主要方法,并在任何存在不确定性的情况下保留DSA检查的策略似乎是安全可靠的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验