Saberi Hooshang, Hashemi Mohammad, Habibi Zohreh, Tayebi Meybodi Ali, Fakhr Tabatabai Seyed Ali, Saberi Hazhir, Saboori Sofia
Department of Neurosurgery, Brain and Spinal Cord Injuries Repair Research Center, Imam Khomeini Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran J Radiol. 2011 Nov;8(3):139-44. doi: 10.5812/kmp.iranjradiol.17351065.3135. Epub 2011 Nov 25.
Conventional angiography, generally referred to as intra-arterial digital subtraction angiography, still remains the gold standard reference method for the diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms, helical computed tomography angiography (CTA) is a new non-invasive volumetric imaging method.
This study was conducted to screen patients presenting with subarachnoidhemorrhage by CTA before conventional digital subtraction angiography (DSA) and subsequently comparing the results for various aneurysm projections.
In a prospective study, 99 consecutive patients with an initial diagnosis of subarachnoid hemorrhage were screened for aneurysms with CTA followed by conventional DSA. There were 17 cases with negative angiograms in whom repeat angiograms, three months later were negative for 15 cases, while two cases were found to bear aneurysm on the repeat examination. Eighty two patients had at least one proven aneurysm on initial DSA and two on the repeat angiogram. Out of 84 patients, five underwent endovascular treatment and 79 patients who underwent surgical clipping were considered for projection evaluation.
Sensitivity of CTA was 98.78% (95% confidence interval [CI], 93.4-99.7%), while the specificity was 100% (95% CI, 81.57-100%) and the kappa coefficient of agreement between CTA and DSA was 96.5%. The most significant discrepancies with DSA findings were for visualizing the projection of inferior and posterior projecting proximal anterior circulation aneurysms.
Helical CTA was in good concordance with DSA for screening of cerebral aneurysms; however, for exact visualization of the aneurysm neck and its projection, especially if it is inferior or posterior, DSA remains the gold standard.
传统血管造影术,通常称为动脉内数字减影血管造影术,仍然是诊断颅内动脉瘤的金标准参考方法,螺旋计算机断层血管造影(CTA)是一种新的非侵入性容积成像方法。
本研究旨在通过CTA在传统数字减影血管造影(DSA)之前对蛛网膜下腔出血患者进行筛查,并随后比较各种动脉瘤投影的结果。
在一项前瞻性研究中,对99例初步诊断为蛛网膜下腔出血的连续患者先用CTA筛查动脉瘤,随后进行传统DSA检查。血管造影阴性的有17例,其中15例在三个月后复查血管造影仍为阴性,而2例在复查时发现有动脉瘤。82例患者在初次DSA检查时至少有一个确诊的动脉瘤,复查血管造影时有两个。在84例患者中,5例接受了血管内治疗,79例接受手术夹闭的患者被纳入投影评估。
CTA的敏感性为98.78%(95%置信区间[CI],93.4 - 99.7%),特异性为100%(95%CI,81.57 - 100%),CTA与DSA之间的kappa一致性系数为96.5%。与DSA结果最显著的差异在于观察下侧和后侧突出的近端前循环动脉瘤的投影。
螺旋CTA在筛查脑动脉瘤方面与DSA具有良好的一致性;然而,对于动脉瘤颈部及其投影的精确观察,特别是如果它是下侧或后侧的,DSA仍然是金标准。