Kluivers Kirsten B, Hendriks Jan C M, Shek Clara, Dietz Hans Peter
791, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2008 Sep;19(9):1299-302. doi: 10.1007/s00192-008-0634-7. Epub 2008 May 9.
Adequate staging of pelvic organ prolapse is important in clinical practice and research. The ability of the POPQ, ordinal stages and ultrasound prolapse assessment were evaluated for their ability to discriminate between women with and without prolapse symptoms. The leading edge of the predominant compartment in the three assessment systems was used for the calculation of receiver operating characteristics curves. Two hundred and sixty five (265) consecutive women were evaluated. The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve for the three staging systems ranged from 0.715 to 0.783. POPQ staging and ordinal staging performed equally well in the prediction of prolapse symptoms (p = 0.780), and both performed better as compared with ultrasound prolapse assessment (p = 0.048 and p = 0.015, respectively). Prolapse staging can equally be performed by the POPQ and ordinal stages systems as far as the discrimination between women with and without prolapse symptoms is concerned. The ultrasound prolapse assessment does not perform better as compared with these two systems.
在临床实践和研究中,对盆腔器官脱垂进行充分的分期很重要。评估了盆腔器官脱垂定量分期系统(POPQ)、序数分期及超声脱垂评估区分有或无脱垂症状女性的能力。三个评估系统中主要腔室的前沿用于计算受试者工作特征曲线。对265名连续入选的女性进行了评估。三个分期系统的受试者工作特征曲线下面积在0.715至0.783之间。POPQ分期和序数分期在预测脱垂症状方面表现相当(p = 0.780),且与超声脱垂评估相比均表现更好(分别为p = 0.048和p = 0.015)。就区分有或无脱垂症状的女性而言,POPQ和序数分期系统在脱垂分期方面表现相当。与这两个系统相比,超声脱垂评估表现并不更好。