Hsu Ming, Anen Cédric, Quartz Steven R
Beckman Institute for Advanced Science and Technology and Department of Economics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL 61801, USA.
Science. 2008 May 23;320(5879):1092-5. doi: 10.1126/science.1153651. Epub 2008 May 8.
Distributive justice concerns how individuals and societies distribute benefits and burdens in a just or moral manner. We combined distribution choices with functional magnetic resonance imaging to investigate the central problem of distributive justice: the trade-off between equity and efficiency. We found that the putamen responds to efficiency, whereas the insula encodes inequity, and the caudate/septal subgenual region encodes a unified measure of efficiency and inequity (utility). Notably, individual differences in inequity aversion correlate with activity in inequity and utility regions. Against utilitarianism, our results support the deontological intuition that a sense of fairness is fundamental to distributive justice but, as suggested by moral sentimentalists, is rooted in emotional processing. More generally, emotional responses related to norm violations may underlie individual differences in equity considerations and adherence to ethical rules.
分配正义关注个人和社会如何以公正或道德的方式分配利益和负担。我们将分配选择与功能磁共振成像相结合,以研究分配正义的核心问题:公平与效率之间的权衡。我们发现,壳核对效率有反应,而脑岛编码不公平,尾状核/隔区亚膝部区域编码效率和不公平的统一度量(效用)。值得注意的是,不公平厌恶的个体差异与不公平和效用区域的活动相关。与功利主义相反,我们的结果支持义务论直觉,即公平感是分配正义的基础,但正如道德情感主义者所指出的,它植根于情感加工。更普遍地说,与违反规范相关的情感反应可能是公平考量和遵守道德规则方面个体差异的基础。