Astrøm Anne Nordrehaug
Department of Oral Science-Community Dentistry, Centre for International Health, University of Bergen, Norway.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2008 Jun;116(3):250-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0722.2008.00538.x.
Using a prospective design and a representative sample of 25-yr-old Norwegians, this study hypothesized that action planning and coping planning will add to the prediction of flossing at 4 wk of follow-up over and above the effect of intention and previous flossing. This study tested the validity of a proposed 3-factor structure of the measurement model of intention, action planning, and coping planning and for its invariance across gender. A survey was conducted in three Norwegian counties, and 1,509 out of 8,000 randomly selected individuals completed questionnaires assessing the constructs of action planning and coping planning related to daily flossing. A random subsample of 500 participants was followed up at 4 wk with a telephone interview to assess flossing. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) confirmed the proposed 3-factor model after respecification. Although the chi-square test was statistically significant [chi(2) = 58.501, degrees of freedom (d.f.) = 17), complementary fit indices were satisfactory [goodness-of-fit index (GFI) = 0.99, root mean squared error of approximation (RMSEA) = 0.04]. Multigroup CFA provided evidence of complete invariance of the measurement model across gender. After controlling for previous flossing, intention (beta = 0.08) and action planning (beta = 0.11) emerged as independent predictors of subsequent flossing, accounting for 2.3% of its variance. Factorial validity of intention, action planning and coping planning, and the validity of action planning in predicting flossing prospectively, was confirmed by the present study.
本研究采用前瞻性设计,并选取了具有代表性的25岁挪威人样本,假设行动规划和应对规划将在意图和先前使用牙线习惯的影响之上,对4周随访时使用牙线的情况预测有所助益。本研究检验了意图、行动规划和应对规划测量模型所提议的三因素结构的有效性及其在不同性别间的不变性。在挪威的三个郡进行了一项调查,从8000名随机选取的个体中,有1509人完成了评估与日常使用牙线相关的行动规划和应对规划构念的问卷。对500名参与者的随机子样本在4周时进行电话随访,以评估使用牙线的情况。验证性因素分析(CFA)在重新设定后证实了所提议的三因素模型。尽管卡方检验在统计学上具有显著性[卡方(2)=58.501,自由度(d.f.) = 17],但补充拟合指数令人满意[拟合优度指数(GFI)=0.99,近似均方根误差(RMSEA)=0.04]。多组CFA提供了测量模型在不同性别间完全不变性的证据。在控制先前使用牙线的习惯后,意图(β = 0.08)和行动规划(β = 0.11)成为后续使用牙线情况的独立预测因素,解释了其2.3%的方差。本研究证实了意图、行动规划和应对规划的因素有效性,以及行动规划在预测未来使用牙线情况方面的有效性。