Steckelbroeck Stephan, Ballmer-Weber Barbara K, Vieths Stefan
Department of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany.
J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2008 Jun;121(6):1323-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2008.04.008. Epub 2008 May 9.
This article aims to critically review developments in food allergy diagnostics with regard to the verification of specific IgE antibodies and the identification of the responsible allergens. Results of IgE-binding tests with food extracts are hampered by cross-reactive proteins, low-quality test agents, or both. Specificity can be increased by defining adequate cutoff values, whereas sensitivity can be improved by using high-quality test agents. IgE-binding tests with purified allergens enabled reliable quantification of allergen-specific IgE titers, with higher levels found in individuals with food allergy compared with individuals without food allergy. However, the overlap in individual test reactivity between allergic and nonallergic subjects complicates interpretation. Recombinant allergens and synthetic sequential epitopes enabled detection of sensitization profiles, with IgE specific to several allergens and substructures now being suggested as markers of severity, persistence, or both. However, high-power quantitative studies with larger numbers of patients are required to confirm these markers. IgE-binding tests merely indicate sensitization, whereas the final proof of clinical relevance still relies on family/case history, physical examinations, and provocation tests. Novel technologies promise superior diagnostics. Microarray technology permits simultaneous measurement of multiple IgE reactivities regarding specificity, abundance, reactivity, or interaction. Improved functional tests might enable reliable estimation of the clinical relevance of IgE sensitizations at justifiable expenses.
本文旨在批判性地回顾食物过敏诊断方面的进展,涉及特异性IgE抗体的验证以及相关过敏原的鉴定。食物提取物的IgE结合试验结果受到交叉反应蛋白、低质量检测试剂或两者的影响。通过定义适当的临界值可以提高特异性,而使用高质量检测试剂可以提高敏感性。使用纯化过敏原的IgE结合试验能够可靠地定量过敏原特异性IgE滴度,食物过敏个体的滴度水平高于非食物过敏个体。然而,过敏和非过敏受试者个体试验反应性的重叠使结果解读变得复杂。重组过敏原和合成连续表位能够检测致敏谱,现在有人提出,针对几种过敏原和亚结构的特异性IgE可作为严重程度、持续性或两者的标志物。然而,需要对更多患者进行大样本量的高功率定量研究来证实这些标志物。IgE结合试验仅表明致敏情况,而临床相关性的最终证据仍依赖于家族/病史、体格检查和激发试验。新技术有望实现更优的诊断。微阵列技术可同时测量多种IgE反应性的特异性、丰度、反应性或相互作用。改进的功能试验可能能够以合理的成本可靠地评估IgE致敏的临床相关性。