• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

利用风险管理文件识别和解决儿科不良事件相关的根本原因。

Using risk management files to identify and address causative factors associated with adverse events in pediatrics.

出版信息

Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Aug;3(4):625-31.

PMID:18472985
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2374929/
Abstract

We report a retrospective analysis of 84 consecutive pediatrics-related internal review files opened by a medical center's risk managers between 1996 and 2001. The aims were to identify common causative factors associated with adverse events/adverse outcomes (AEs) in a Pediatrics Department, then suggest ways to improve care. The main outcome was identification of any patterns of factors that contributed to AEs so that interventions could be designed to address them. Cases were noted to have at least one apparent contributing problem; the most common were with communication (44% of cases), diagnosis and treatment (37%), medication errors (20%), and IV/Central line issues (17%). 45% of files involved a child with an underlying diagnosis putting her/him at high risk for an adverse outcome. All Pediatrics Departments face multiple challenges in assuring consistent quality care. The extent to which the data generalize to other institutions is unknown. However, the data suggest that systematic analysis of aggregated claims files may help identify and drive opportunities for improvement in care.

摘要

我们对一家医疗中心风险管理人员在 1996 年至 2001 年间开启的 84 例儿科相关内部审查档案进行了回顾性分析。目的是确定儿科不良事件/不良结局(AE)相关的常见致病因素,然后提出改善护理的方法。主要结果是确定导致 AE 的因素模式,以便设计干预措施来解决这些问题。这些案例都有至少一个明显的致病问题;最常见的是沟通问题(占 44%)、诊断和治疗问题(37%)、用药错误问题(20%)以及静脉内/中央导管问题(17%)。45%的档案涉及患有潜在疾病的儿童,这些儿童有发生不良后果的高风险。所有儿科部门在确保一致的高质量护理方面都面临着多重挑战。这些数据在多大程度上适用于其他机构尚不清楚。然而,数据表明,对汇总理赔档案进行系统分析可能有助于识别和推动护理改进的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a52/2374929/93eaae589f28/tcrm0304-625-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a52/2374929/93eaae589f28/tcrm0304-625-01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7a52/2374929/93eaae589f28/tcrm0304-625-01.jpg

相似文献

1
Using risk management files to identify and address causative factors associated with adverse events in pediatrics.利用风险管理文件识别和解决儿科不良事件相关的根本原因。
Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2007 Aug;3(4):625-31.
2
Cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology.妇产科闭合性医疗纠纷索赔的因果关系分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;105(5 Pt 1):1031-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000158864.09443.77.
3
Cause-and-effect analysis of risk management files to assess patient care in the emergency department.
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;11(10):1035-41. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.04.012.
4
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
5
Perioperative outcomes for pediatric neurosurgical procedures: analysis of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatrics.小儿神经外科手术的围手术期结局:国家外科质量改进计划-儿科分析
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2017 Mar;19(3):361-371. doi: 10.3171/2016.10.PEDS16414. Epub 2017 Jan 6.
6
Application of a trigger tool in near real time to inform quality improvement activities: a prospective study in a general medicine ward.近实时应用触发工具以指导质量改进活动:一项在内科病房进行的前瞻性研究
BMJ Qual Saf. 2015 Apr;24(4):272-81. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2014-003432. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
7
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
8
9
Medication errors: an analysis comparing PHICO's closed claims data and PHICO's Event Reporting Trending System (PERTS).用药差错:一项比较PHICO的结案索赔数据与PHICO事件报告趋势系统(PERTS)的分析。
J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jul;43(7):754-9.
10
Adverse sedation events in pediatrics: a critical incident analysis of contributing factors.儿科镇静不良事件:促成因素的关键事件分析
Pediatrics. 2000 Apr;105(4 Pt 1):805-14. doi: 10.1542/peds.105.4.805.

本文引用的文献

1
Reconsidering the Harvard Medical Practice Study conclusions about the validity of medical malpractice claims.
J Law Med Ethics. 2005 Fall;33(3):501-14. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-720x.2005.tb00514.x.
2
Crew resource management training--clinicians' reactions and attitudes.机组资源管理培训——临床医生的反应和态度。
AORN J. 2005 Aug;82(2):213-24; quiz 225-8. doi: 10.1016/s0001-2092(06)60313-x.
3
Cause and effect analysis of closed claims in obstetrics and gynecology.妇产科闭合性医疗纠纷索赔的因果关系分析
Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;105(5 Pt 1):1031-8. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000158864.09443.77.
4
Cause-and-effect analysis of risk management files to assess patient care in the emergency department.
Acad Emerg Med. 2004 Oct;11(10):1035-41. doi: 10.1197/j.aem.2004.04.012.
5
Computerized physician order entry and medication errors in a pediatric critical care unit.儿科重症监护病房中的计算机化医嘱录入与用药错误
Pediatrics. 2004 Jan;113(1 Pt 1):59-63. doi: 10.1542/peds.113.1.59.
6
Retrospective data collection and analytical techniques for patient safety studies.用于患者安全研究的回顾性数据收集与分析技术。
J Biomed Inform. 2003 Feb-Apr;36(1-2):106-19. doi: 10.1016/j.jbi.2003.08.002.
7
Surgical adverse events, risk management, and malpractice outcome: morbidity and mortality review is not enough.手术不良事件、风险管理与医疗事故结果:发病率和死亡率审查是不够的。
Ann Surg. 2003 Jun;237(6):844-51; discussion 851-2. doi: 10.1097/01.SLA.0000072267.19263.26.
8
From aviation to medicine: applying concepts of aviation safety to risk management in ambulatory care.从航空到医学:将航空安全概念应用于门诊医疗风险管理
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Feb;12(1):35-9. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.1.35.
9
Error reduction and performance improvement in the emergency department through formal teamwork training: evaluation results of the MedTeams project.通过正式的团队合作培训减少急诊科的失误并提高绩效:MedTeams项目的评估结果
Health Serv Res. 2002 Dec;37(6):1553-81. doi: 10.1111/1475-6773.01104.
10
Patient complaints and malpractice risk.患者投诉与医疗事故风险。
JAMA. 2002 Jun 12;287(22):2951-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.22.2951.