Allan Lorraine G, Hannah Samuel D, Crump Matthew J C, Siegel Shepard
Department of Psychology, Neuroscience, and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2008 May;137(2):226-43. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.137.2.226.
The authors previously described a procedure that permits rapid, multiple within-participant evaluations of contingency assessment (the "streamed-trial" procedure, M. J. C. Crump, S. D. Hannah, L. G. Allan, & L. K. Hord, 2007). In the present experiments, they used the streamed-trial procedure, combined with the method of constant stimuli and a binary classification response, to assess the psychophysics of contingency assessment. This strategy provides a methodology for evaluating whether variations in contingency assessment reflect changes in the participant's sensitivity to the contingency or changes in the participant's response bias (or decision criterion). The sign of the contingency (positive or negative), outcome density, and imposition of an explicit payoff structure had little influence on sensitivity to contingencies but did influence the decision criterion. The authors discuss how a psychophysical analysis can provide a better understanding of findings in the literature such as mood and age effects on contingency assessment. They also discuss the relation between a psychophysical approach and an associative account of contingency assessment.
作者们此前描述了一种程序,该程序允许对偶然性评估进行快速、多次的参与者内评估(“流式试验”程序,M. J. C. 克伦普、S. D. 汉娜、L. G. 艾伦和L. K. 霍德,2007年)。在本实验中,他们使用流式试验程序,结合恒定刺激法和二元分类反应,来评估偶然性评估的心理物理学。这种策略提供了一种方法,用于评估偶然性评估的变化是反映了参与者对偶然性的敏感性变化,还是反映了参与者反应偏差(或决策标准)的变化。偶然性的符号(正或负)、结果密度以及明确支付结构的施加,对偶然性敏感性影响不大,但确实影响决策标准。作者们讨论了心理物理学分析如何能更好地理解文献中的研究结果,如情绪和年龄对偶然性评估的影响。他们还讨论了心理物理学方法与偶然性评估的联想解释之间的关系。