Stebbing N, Grantham C A
Arch Virol. 1976;51(3):199-215. doi: 10.1007/BF01318024.
Mice are protected against lethal intraperitoneal and intravenous infection by encephalomyocarditis virus and Semliki Forest virus by sequential treatment with poly I followed by either polyC or poly5-hydroxyC without production of interferon when the treatments are 4 or more hours apart and by the intraperitoneal or intravenous routes. Maximum protection occurs around 4 hours before infection and is still significant 20 hours after infection. Treatments with combinations of other homoribopolynucleotides were not found to be anti-viral. Protection by sequential polyI, polyC treatment of mice is relatively short-lived and does not 'hypo-reactivate' the protective effect of polyI:C and shows approximately half the protective effect of polyI:C. The toxicity of sequential polyI, polyC treatment is lower than that of polyI:C particularly if poly5-hydroxyC is substituted for polyC. Silica treatment of mice indicates that stationary macrophages are required for protection by polyI followed by polyC but an effect on humoral or cell mediated immune responses does not appear to be involved. The effect appears to be a synergism between the protection conferred by polyI or polyC alone.
通过先给予多聚肌苷酸(poly I),然后在间隔4小时或更长时间后通过腹腔或静脉途径给予多聚胞苷酸(polyC)或聚5-羟基胞苷酸(poly5-hydroxyC)进行序贯治疗,小鼠可免受脑心肌炎病毒和Semliki森林病毒致死性腹腔内和静脉内感染,且治疗过程中不产生干扰素。最大保护作用出现在感染前约4小时,感染后20小时仍很显著。未发现其他同型核糖多核苷酸组合治疗具有抗病毒作用。通过多聚肌苷酸、多聚胞苷酸序贯治疗小鼠的保护作用相对短暂,不会“低反应性激活”多聚肌苷酸:胞苷酸(polyI:C)的保护作用,且显示出约为多聚肌苷酸:胞苷酸保护作用一半的效果。多聚肌苷酸、多聚胞苷酸序贯治疗的毒性低于多聚肌苷酸:胞苷酸,特别是用聚5-羟基胞苷酸替代多聚胞苷酸时。对小鼠进行二氧化硅处理表明,多聚肌苷酸后接多聚胞苷酸提供保护需要静止巨噬细胞,但似乎不涉及对体液或细胞介导免疫反应的影响。这种作用似乎是多聚肌苷酸或多聚胞苷酸单独提供的保护之间的协同作用。