Suppr超能文献

儿科重症监护病房的收治来源不同,治疗结果会有所差异吗?

Do outcomes vary according to the source of admission to the pediatric intensive care unit?

作者信息

Odetola Folafoluwa O, Rosenberg Andrew L, Davis Matthew M, Clark Sarah J, Dechert Ronald E, Shanley Thomas P

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics and Communicable Diseases, Division of Pediatric Critical Care Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

出版信息

Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2008 Jan;9(1):20-5. doi: 10.1097/01.PCC.0000298642.11872.29.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To examine associations between mortality, length of stay, and the sources of admission to tertiary pediatric intensive care.

DESIGN

A retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data.

SETTING

A tertiary medical center with a 16-bed medical-surgical intensive care unit and a 15-bed cardiac pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

PATIENTS

All admissions from July 1, 1998, through June 30, 2004. Multivariable regression methods compared length of stay and mortality between the sources of PICU admission, controlling for multiple variables, including severity of illness.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Of 8,897 eligible admissions, 74% were directly from the study hospital's emergency department or operating rooms, while 26% were from indirect sources, including the study hospital's wards (11%) or interhospital transfer from either non-PICU (12%) or PICU settings (3%). Compared with emergency department admissions, ward admissions had higher odds of mortality (odds ratio 1.65, 95% confidence interval 1.08-2.51), transfer admissions from non-PICU settings did not have elevated odds of mortality (odds ratio 0.80, 95% confidence interval 0.51-1.25), and inter-PICU transfer admissions had higher odds of mortality (odds ratio 1.43, 95% confidence interval 0.80-2.56), although not reaching statistical significance. Compared with emergency department admissions, ward admissions stayed almost 4 days longer in the PICU, while interhospital transfer admissions from non-PICU and PICU settings stayed 2 and 6 days longer, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Outcomes of tertiary pediatric intensive care vary significantly by source of admission. Strategies aimed at reduction of mortality at the tertiary PICU should target transfer admissions from the hospital's wards and from PICUs of other hospitals.

摘要

目的

研究三级儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的死亡率、住院时间与入院来源之间的关联。

设计

对前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性分析。

地点

一家三级医疗中心,设有一个拥有16张床位的内科-外科重症监护病房和一个拥有15张床位的心脏儿科重症监护病房(PICU)。

患者

1998年7月1日至2004年6月30日期间的所有入院患者。采用多变量回归方法比较PICU不同入院来源之间的住院时间和死亡率,并对包括疾病严重程度在内的多个变量进行控制。

干预措施

无。

测量指标及主要结果

在8897例符合条件的入院患者中,74%直接来自研究医院的急诊科或手术室,26%来自间接来源,包括研究医院的病房(11%)或来自非PICU(12%)或PICU环境(3%)的院际转运。与急诊科入院患者相比,病房入院患者的死亡几率更高(优势比1.65,95%置信区间1.08 - 2.51),非PICU环境的转运入院患者的死亡几率没有升高(优势比0.80,95%置信区间0.51 - 1.25),PICU间转运入院患者的死亡几率更高(优势比1.43,95%置信区间0.80 - 2.56),尽管未达到统计学显著性。与急诊科入院患者相比,病房入院患者在PICU的住院时间几乎长4天,而非PICU和PICU环境的院际转运入院患者分别长2天和6天。

结论

三级儿科重症监护的结果因入院来源不同而有显著差异。旨在降低三级PICU死亡率的策略应针对来自医院病房和其他医院PICU的转运入院患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验