Suppr超能文献

德国市级紧急医疗服务(EMS)系统中儿科转运与急救的流行病学:一项队列研究

Epidemiology of Pediatric Transports and First Aid in a German Municipal Emergency Medical Services (EMS) System: A Cohort Study.

作者信息

Garrelfs Katharina, Kuehne Benjamin, Hinkelbein Jochen, Blomeyer Ralf, Eifinger Frank

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Division of Neonatology and Pediatric Intensive Care, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.

Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care Medicine, and Emergency Medicine, Johannes Wesling Klinikum Minden, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany.

出版信息

Emerg Med Int. 2025 Apr 14;2025:8184007. doi: 10.1155/emmi/8184007. eCollection 2025.

Abstract

Pediatric emergencies remain a significant challenge for emergency services. The study aimed to retrospectively analyze invasive measures and medication administered during prehospital care. The analysis focused on invasive procedures (e.g., tracheal intubation and vascular access) performed on pediatric patients (aged 1 month to 12 years) admitted via the Central Emergency Department (ED) or directly to the University Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) of the University Hospital of Cologne. These findings provide insights into quality assurance and improvement of prehospital care and invasive emergency techniques in pediatrics. Emergency protocols were evaluated, including parameters such as the Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and National Advisory Committee for Aeronautics (NACA) score. Patients were categorized based on diagnosis, medication administration, and invasive emergency techniques. A total of 373 patients were admitted to the ED, and 237 patients were admitted to the PICU between 01/2015 and 05/2020. Sedation was at similar in both groups, while catecholamines were more frequently used in the PICU group. Invasive procedures, such as tracheal intubation, were rare (PICU: 9.5%; ED: 5.8%; =0.093). Peripheral venous access was performed in 33.7% of PICU cases and 51.2% of ED cases, whereas central venous access was almost never performed. 19 children admitted to the PICU died compared to one in the ED ( < 0.001). Invasive procedures are rarely performed during prehospital care for pediatric patients. Trauma cases predominated in the ED group (99.2%), whereas the PICU group exhibited greater diagnostic variability, including trauma and internal emergencies. This study identified significant gaps in medical documentation. Training for paramedics and emergency health workers should prioritize airway management, including supraglottic airway (SGA) devices, thoracic drainage, and vascular access techniques such as peripheral intravenous (PIV) and intraosseous (IO) access. Additionally, efforts to improve medical documentation should be emphasized to enhance pediatric emergency care.

摘要

儿科急诊仍然是急诊服务面临的重大挑战。本研究旨在回顾性分析院前护理期间采取的侵入性措施和使用的药物。分析重点关注对通过科隆大学医院中央急诊科(ED)入院或直接入住大学儿科重症监护病房(PICU)的儿科患者(年龄1个月至12岁)实施的侵入性操作(如气管插管和血管通路建立)。这些发现为儿科院前护理及侵入性急救技术的质量保证和改进提供了见解。对急救预案进行了评估,包括格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)和美国国家航空咨询委员会(NACA)评分等参数。根据诊断、药物使用和侵入性急救技术对患者进行分类。在2015年1月至2020年5月期间,共有373例患者入住ED,237例患者入住PICU。两组的镇静情况相似,而儿茶酚胺在PICU组使用更为频繁。气管插管等侵入性操作很少见(PICU:9.5%;ED:5.8%;P = 0.093)。33.7%的PICU病例和51.2%的ED病例进行了外周静脉通路建立,而几乎从未进行过中心静脉通路建立。入住PICU的19名儿童死亡,而入住ED的有1名儿童死亡(P < 0.001)。儿科患者院前护理期间很少进行侵入性操作。ED组中创伤病例占主导(99.2%),而PICU组的诊断变异性更大,包括创伤和内科急症。本研究发现医疗记录存在重大差距。对护理人员和急救卫生工作者的培训应优先考虑气道管理,包括声门上气道(SGA)装置、胸腔引流以及外周静脉(PIV)和骨内(IO)通路等血管通路技术。此外,应强调努力改进医疗记录以加强儿科急诊护理。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d16e/12011464/49548a7b3978/EMI2025-8184007.001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验