Grammer L C, Harris K E, Shaughnessy M A, Dolovich J, Patterson R, Evans S
Department of Medicine, Northwestern University Medical School, Chicago, Illinois 60611.
Artif Organs. 1991 Feb;15(1):2-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1525-1594.1991.tb00752.x.
In a majority of patients with anaphylaxis to dialysis, ethylene oxide has been identified as an etiologic agent. In a significant minority of patients sustaining such reactions, the antigen remains unidentified. Conflicting results have been published with regard to isocyanates as a possible antigen. The authors studied 19 hemodialysis patients with anaphylaxis in whom IgE against ethylene oxide-human serum albumin (ETO-HSA) was not identified (Group 1) and 25 peritoneal dialysis patients without anaphylaxis (Group 2). IgE against toluene diisocyanate-human serum albumin (TDI-HSA) was found in one patient in Group 1, and a similar incidence of IgG against TDI-HSA in Group 1 (16%) and Group 2 (12%) was noted. The results do not suggest that IgE against TDI-HSA is an important cause of dialysis anaphylaxis.
在大多数对透析发生过敏反应的患者中,环氧乙烷已被确定为病因。在少数发生此类反应的患者中,抗原仍未明确。关于异氰酸酯作为可能的抗原,已有相互矛盾的研究结果发表。作者研究了19例发生过敏反应的血液透析患者(第1组),这些患者体内未检测到抗环氧乙烷 - 人血清白蛋白(ETO - HSA)的IgE,以及25例未发生过敏反应的腹膜透析患者(第2组)。在第1组的1例患者中发现了抗甲苯二异氰酸酯 - 人血清白蛋白(TDI - HSA)的IgE,并且注意到第1组(16%)和第2组(12%)中抗TDI - HSA的IgG发生率相似。这些结果并不表明抗TDI - HSA的IgE是透析过敏反应的重要原因。