Bai Zheng-Gang, Yang Ke-Hu, Liu Ya-Li, Tian Jin-Hui, Ma Bin, Mi Deng-Hai, Jiang Lei, Tan Ji-Ying, Gai Qiong-Yan
Evidence-Based Medicine Centre of LanZhou University, LanZhou, People's Republic of China.
Int J STD AIDS. 2008 Apr;19(4):217-21. doi: 10.1258/ijsa.2007.007245.
The World Health Organization estimates that at least 12 million people are infected with syphilis in the world. Southeast Asia accounts for 5.8 million; Africa accounts for 3.5 million. There has been controversy in using the two kinds of antibiotics for early syphilis. A systematic review comparing these antibiotics could affect treatment guidelines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of azithromycin vs. penicillin G benzathine for early syphilis and a meta-analysis to compare these two kinds of antibiotics for early syphilis. Four randomized controlled trials met the inclusion criteria; 476 patients were evaluated for their cure rate. Cure rates were 95.0% (227/239) for azithromycin and 84.0% (199/237) for penicillin G benzathine. After pooling the data, the difference in efficacy was computed. Cure rate (OR=1.37), 95% CI (1.05, 1.77) and the risk difference for cure rate between the two drugs were statistically significant. Although the gastrointestinal adverse effect of azithromycin is five times more than the adverse effect of penicillin G benzathine, the differences are not significant. Azithromycin achieved a higher cure rate than penicillin G benzathine in a long follow-up.
世界卫生组织估计,全球至少有1200万人感染梅毒。东南亚有580万人感染;非洲有350万人感染。在早期梅毒治疗中使用这两种抗生素一直存在争议。一项比较这两种抗生素的系统评价可能会影响治疗指南。本研究的目的是评估阿奇霉素与苄星青霉素治疗早期梅毒的疗效和安全性,并进行荟萃分析以比较这两种抗生素治疗早期梅毒的效果。四项随机对照试验符合纳入标准;对476例患者的治愈率进行了评估。阿奇霉素组的治愈率为95.0%(227/239),苄星青霉素组为84.0%(199/237)。汇总数据后,计算疗效差异。治愈率(OR=1.37),95%可信区间(1.05,1.77),两种药物治愈率的风险差异具有统计学意义。虽然阿奇霉素的胃肠道不良反应是苄星青霉素的5倍,但差异无统计学意义。在长期随访中,阿奇霉素的治愈率高于苄星青霉素。