Suppr超能文献

基于计算机的教学与基于面对面讲座的循证医学教学效果相当:一项随机对照试验。

Computer-based teaching is as good as face to face lecture-based teaching of evidence based medicine: a randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Davis James, Crabb Sarah, Rogers Elizabeth, Zamora Javier, Khan Khalid

机构信息

The Birmingham Women's Hospital NHS Trust, UK.

出版信息

Med Teach. 2008;30(3):302-7. doi: 10.1080/01421590701784349.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Assessing in undergraduate medical education the educational effectiveness of a short computer-based session, integrating a lecturer's video with a standardized structure, for evidence based medicine (EBM) teaching, compared to a lecture-based teaching session of similar structure and duration.

METHOD

A concealed, randomized controlled trial of computer based session versus lecture of equal duration (40 minutes) and identical content in EBM and systematic reviews. The study was based at the Medical School, University of Birmingham, UK involving one hundred and seventynine year one medical students. The main outcome measures were change from pre to post-intervention score measured using a validated questionnaire assessing knowledge (primary outcome) and attitudes (secondary outcome).

RESULTS

Participants' improvement in knowledge in the computer based group was equivalent to the lecture based group (gain in score: 0.8 [S.D = 3.2] versus 1.3 [S.D = 2.4]; p = 0.24). Attitudinal gains were similar in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Computer based teaching and typical lecture sessions have similar educational gains.

摘要

背景

在本科医学教育中,评估一个简短的基于计算机的课程(将讲师视频与标准化结构相结合用于循证医学教学)与一个结构和时长相似的基于讲座的教学课程相比,其教育效果。

方法

一项关于基于计算机的课程与时长相同(40分钟)且循证医学和系统评价内容相同的讲座的隐蔽随机对照试验。该研究在英国伯明翰大学医学院进行,涉及179名一年级医学生。主要结局指标是使用经过验证的评估知识(主要结局)和态度(次要结局)的问卷测量干预前后的得分变化。

结果

基于计算机的组中参与者知识的提高与基于讲座的组相当(得分增加:0.8 [标准差=3.2] 对比1.3 [标准差=2.4];p = 0.24)。两组在态度方面的收获相似。

结论

基于计算机的教学和传统讲座课程具有相似的教育收获。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验