Suppr超能文献

循证实践教学方法:系统评价。

Methods of teaching evidence-based practice: a systematic review.

机构信息

Medical Education Research & Quality (MERQ) Unit, School of Public Health & Preventive Medicine, Monash University, Level 1, 553 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC, 3004, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Educ. 2022 Oct 26;22(1):742. doi: 10.1186/s12909-022-03812-x.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To identify the effectiveness of different teaching modalities on student evidence-based practice (EBP) competency.

METHODS

Electronic searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Cochrane central register of controlled trials, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, A + Education and AEI through to November 2021. We included randomised-controlled trials comparing EBP teaching modes on EBP knowledge, skills, attitudes or behaviour in undergraduate and post-graduate health professions education. Risk of bias was determined using the Cochrane risk of bias tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-one studies were included in the review. Overall, no single teaching modality was identified as being superior to others at significantly increasing learner competency in EBP. Changes in learner knowledge, skills, attitudes and behaviour were conflicting, with studies either reporting no change, or a moderate increase in EBP behavioural outcomes when directly compared to another intervention.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence highlights the lack of a single teaching modality that is superior than others regarding learner competency in EBP, regardless of health professions discipline or graduate status. The poor quality, heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures limited conclusions. Further research should focus on the development of high-quality studies and use of psychometrically validated tools to further explore the impact of different EBP teaching modalities.

摘要

背景

为了确定不同教学模式对学生循证实践(EBP)能力的影响。

方法

我们在 MEDLINE、Cochrane 对照试验中心注册、PsycINFO、CINAHL、ERIC、A + Education 和 AEI 电子数据库中进行了检索,检索时间截至 2021 年 11 月。我们纳入了比较本科和研究生健康专业教育中 EBP 教学模式对 EBP 知识、技能、态度或行为影响的随机对照试验。使用 Cochrane 偏倚风险工具评估偏倚风险。

结果

本综述共纳入 21 项研究。总体而言,没有一种单一的教学模式被确定为在显著提高学习者 EBP 能力方面优于其他模式。学习者知识、技能、态度和行为的变化相互矛盾,与其他干预措施直接比较时,一些研究报告没有变化,而一些研究报告报告 EBP 行为结果有适度增加。

结论

目前的证据表明,无论健康专业学科或研究生学历如何,都没有一种单一的教学模式在 EBP 学习者能力方面优于其他模式。干预措施和结果测量的质量差、异质性限制了结论。进一步的研究应侧重于开发高质量的研究,并使用心理测量学验证的工具来进一步探索不同 EBP 教学模式的影响。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8f3c/9608880/20a1fa570feb/12909_2022_3812_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验