• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大的、清晰的细胞质空泡化:细针穿刺时区分胰腺实性假乳头状肿瘤与胰腺内分泌肿瘤的一个未被充分认识的细胞学线索。

Large, clear cytoplasmic vacuolation: an under-recognized cytologic clue to distinguish solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas from pancreatic endocrine neoplasms on fine-needle aspiration.

作者信息

Jhala Nirag, Siegal Gene P, Jhala Darshana

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 19th Street and 5th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2008 Aug 25;114(4):249-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23595.

DOI:10.1002/cncr.23595
PMID:18484644
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) and pancreatic endocrine neoplasm (PEN) are uncommon neoplasms that demonstrate characteristic cytologic features. It is also known that both these tumors may share similar morphologic changes. These features not uncommonly pose significant diagnostic challenge for unsuspecting cytopathologists. In the current study, the authors report that recognition of clear cytoplasmic vacuoles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) samples from SPN serves as a useful clue that can distinguish this tumor from PEN.

METHODS

The cytologic features from 5 SPN and 20 PEN cases were evaluated. Both Diff-Quik and Papanicolaou stains from these cases were examined. A Fisher exact test of probability was performed to determine differences in the individual cytologic features noted in these 2 tumor types.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that pseudopapillary groups (P = .004); metachromatic matrix material (P = .004); nuclear membrane irregularity (P = .004); and large, clear cytoplasmic vacuoles (P = .001) are noted significantly more frequently in SPN. The authors also demonstrated that large, clear cytoplasmic vacuoles can serve as a powerful cytologic clue for the suspicion of SPN over PEN when there is a paucity of papillary groups within the smears. Large, clear cytoplasmic vacuoles, however, were noted only in Diff-Quik-stained smears, but not in Papanicolaou-;stained smears.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study highlight that large, clear cytoplasmic vacuoles can serve as a critical clue with which to distinguish SPN from PEN in diagnostically challenging cases.

摘要

背景

实性假乳头状肿瘤(SPN)和胰腺内分泌肿瘤(PEN)是具有特征性细胞学特征的罕见肿瘤。还已知这两种肿瘤可能有相似的形态学改变。这些特征常常给毫无防备的细胞病理学家带来重大诊断挑战。在本研究中,作者报告称,在SPN的内镜超声引导下细针穿刺(EUS-FNA)样本中识别出清晰的胞质空泡是一个有用线索,可将该肿瘤与PEN区分开来。

方法

评估了5例SPN和20例PEN病例的细胞学特征。检查了这些病例的Diff-Quik染色和巴氏染色。进行概率的Fisher精确检验以确定这两种肿瘤类型中所观察到的个体细胞学特征的差异。

结果

结果表明,假乳头状结构(P = 0.004)、异染性基质物质(P = 0.004)、核膜不规则(P = 0.004)以及大的、清晰的胞质空泡(P = 0.001)在SPN中出现的频率显著更高。作者还证明,当涂片中假乳头状结构较少时,大的、清晰的胞质空泡可作为怀疑SPN而非PEN的有力细胞学线索。然而,大的、清晰的胞质空泡仅在Diff-Quik染色涂片中观察到,而在巴氏染色涂片中未观察到。

结论

本研究结果强调,在诊断具有挑战性的病例中,大的、清晰的胞质空泡可作为区分SPN与PEN的关键线索。

相似文献

1
Large, clear cytoplasmic vacuolation: an under-recognized cytologic clue to distinguish solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas from pancreatic endocrine neoplasms on fine-needle aspiration.大的、清晰的细胞质空泡化:细针穿刺时区分胰腺实性假乳头状肿瘤与胰腺内分泌肿瘤的一个未被充分认识的细胞学线索。
Cancer. 2008 Aug 25;114(4):249-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23595.
2
E-cadherin/beta-catenin and CD10: a limited immunohistochemical panel to distinguish pancreatic endocrine neoplasm from solid pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates of the pancreas.E-钙黏蛋白/β-连环蛋白和CD10:在内镜超声引导下胰腺细针穿刺抽吸物中,用于区分胰腺内分泌肿瘤与胰腺实性假乳头状肿瘤的有限免疫组织化学检测组合。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2009 Dec;132(6):831-9. doi: 10.1309/AJCPVT8FCLFDTZWI.
3
Solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: awareness of unusual clinical presentations and morphology of the clear cell variant can prevent diagnostic errors.胰腺实性假乳头状肿瘤:认识到透明细胞变体不寻常的临床表现和形态可避免诊断错误。
Diagn Cytopathol. 2013 Oct;41(10):889-95. doi: 10.1002/dc.22989. Epub 2013 Apr 15.
4
Fine-needle aspiration cytology of mucinous tumors of the pancreas.胰腺黏液性肿瘤的细针穿刺细胞学检查
Cancer. 2004 Apr 25;102(2):92-9. doi: 10.1002/cncr.20052.
5
Cercariform cells: another cytologic feature distinguishing solid pseudopapillary neoplasms from pancreatic endocrine neoplasms and acinar cell carcinomas in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspirates.类圆形细胞:另一个细胞学特征,有助于在内镜超声引导下细针抽吸中鉴别实性假乳头状肿瘤与胰腺内分泌肿瘤和腺泡细胞癌。
Cancer Cytopathol. 2013 Jun;121(6):298-310. doi: 10.1002/cncy.21259. Epub 2012 Dec 5.
6
Cytoplasmic vacuoles: clue in the fine-needle aspiration diagnosis of melanoma.细胞质空泡:黑色素瘤细针穿刺诊断的线索
Diagn Cytopathol. 2014 Feb;42(2):143-6. doi: 10.1002/dc.23018. Epub 2013 Jun 1.
7
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: a study of 48 cases.内镜超声引导下胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤细针穿刺细胞学检查:48例研究
Cancer. 2008 Aug 25;114(4):255-62. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23637.
8
Clear-cell variant of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: a case report and review of the literature.胰腺实性假乳头肿瘤的透明细胞变体:1例病例报告及文献复习
Malays J Pathol. 2009 Dec;31(2):137-41.
9
Loss of E-cadherin and cytoplasmic-nuclear expression of beta-catenin are the most useful immunoprofiles in the diagnosis of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas.E-钙黏蛋白的缺失和β-连环蛋白的胞质-核表达是胰腺实性假乳头状肿瘤诊断中最有用的免疫特征。
Hum Pathol. 2008 Feb;39(2):251-8. doi: 10.1016/j.humpath.2007.06.014. Epub 2007 Oct 24.
10
Fine-needle aspiration cytology of pancreatic somatostatinoma: the importance of immunohistochemistry for the cytologic diagnosis of pancreatic endocrine neoplasms.胰腺生长抑素瘤的细针穿刺细胞学检查:免疫组织化学在胰腺内分泌肿瘤细胞学诊断中的重要性
Diagn Cytopathol. 2005 Aug;33(2):100-5. doi: 10.1002/dc.20305.

引用本文的文献

1
Cytological Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid-Pseudopapillary Neoplasm: A Single-Institution Community Practice Experience.胰腺实性假乳头状肿瘤的细胞学诊断:单机构社区实践经验
Diagnostics (Basel). 2022 Feb 9;12(2):449. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics12020449.
2
Hyperpolyploidization of hepatocyte initiates preneoplastic lesion formation in the liver.肝细胞的超多倍体化启动肝脏的癌前病变形成。
Nat Commun. 2021 Jan 28;12(1):645. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-20572-8.
3
Comparison of the clinicopathological features of pancreatic solid pseudopapillary neoplasms between males and females: gender does matter.
男性和女性胰腺实性假乳头状瘤的临床病理特征比较:性别很重要。
Histol Histopathol. 2020 Mar;35(3):257-268. doi: 10.14670/HH-18-156. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
4
Solid Pseudopapillary Tumor of the Pancreas: An Unusual Cause of Abdominal Pain.胰腺实性假乳头状瘤:腹痛的一种罕见病因。
Cureus. 2017 May 16;9(5):e1252. doi: 10.7759/cureus.1252.
5
Differential diagnosis between pancreatic neuroendocrine and solid pseudopapillary neoplasms on endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration. An immunohistochemical study.内镜超声引导下细针穿刺对胰腺神经内分泌肿瘤与实性假乳头状肿瘤的鉴别诊断:一项免疫组织化学研究
Saudi Med J. 2016 Jul;37(7):744-9. doi: 10.15537/smj.2016.7.14212.
6
Accuracy of diagnosis of solid pseudopapillary tumor of the pancreas on fine needle aspiration: A multi-institution experience of ten cases.胰腺实性假乳头状瘤细针穿刺诊断的准确性:十例多机构经验
Cytojournal. 2015 Dec 4;12:29. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.171140. eCollection 2015.
7
A pancreatic pseudopapillary tumor enucleated curatively.根治性剜除的胰腺实性假乳头状瘤。
Int J Surg Case Rep. 2015;10:118-20. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2015.03.040. Epub 2015 Mar 25.
8
Authors attain comparable or slightly higher rates of citation publishing in an open access journal (CytoJournal) compared to traditional cytopathology journals - A five year (2007-2011) experience.与传统细胞病理学期刊相比,作者在开放获取期刊(《细胞杂志》)上发表文章获得的引用率相当或略高——一项为期五年(2007 - 2011年)的经验。
Cytojournal. 2014 Apr 29;11:10. doi: 10.4103/1742-6413.131739. eCollection 2014.
9
Solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas: a report of two cases.胰腺实性假乳头状肿瘤:2例报告
Case Rep Med. 2014;2014:356379. doi: 10.1155/2014/356379. Epub 2014 Jun 1.
10
Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration improves the pre-operative diagnostic yield of solid-pseudopapillary neoplasm of the pancreas: an international multicenter case series (with video).内镜超声引导下细针穿刺提高胰腺实性假乳头状瘤的术前诊断率:一项国际多中心病例系列研究(附视频)
Surg Endosc. 2014 Sep;28(9):2592-8. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3508-8. Epub 2014 Apr 10.