Suppr超能文献

大的、清晰的细胞质空泡化:细针穿刺时区分胰腺实性假乳头状肿瘤与胰腺内分泌肿瘤的一个未被充分认识的细胞学线索。

Large, clear cytoplasmic vacuolation: an under-recognized cytologic clue to distinguish solid pseudopapillary neoplasms of the pancreas from pancreatic endocrine neoplasms on fine-needle aspiration.

作者信息

Jhala Nirag, Siegal Gene P, Jhala Darshana

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 19th Street and 5th Avenue South, Birmingham, AL 35249, USA.

出版信息

Cancer. 2008 Aug 25;114(4):249-54. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23595.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Solid pseudopapillary neoplasm (SPN) and pancreatic endocrine neoplasm (PEN) are uncommon neoplasms that demonstrate characteristic cytologic features. It is also known that both these tumors may share similar morphologic changes. These features not uncommonly pose significant diagnostic challenge for unsuspecting cytopathologists. In the current study, the authors report that recognition of clear cytoplasmic vacuoles in endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) samples from SPN serves as a useful clue that can distinguish this tumor from PEN.

METHODS

The cytologic features from 5 SPN and 20 PEN cases were evaluated. Both Diff-Quik and Papanicolaou stains from these cases were examined. A Fisher exact test of probability was performed to determine differences in the individual cytologic features noted in these 2 tumor types.

RESULTS

The results demonstrated that pseudopapillary groups (P = .004); metachromatic matrix material (P = .004); nuclear membrane irregularity (P = .004); and large, clear cytoplasmic vacuoles (P = .001) are noted significantly more frequently in SPN. The authors also demonstrated that large, clear cytoplasmic vacuoles can serve as a powerful cytologic clue for the suspicion of SPN over PEN when there is a paucity of papillary groups within the smears. Large, clear cytoplasmic vacuoles, however, were noted only in Diff-Quik-stained smears, but not in Papanicolaou-;stained smears.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the current study highlight that large, clear cytoplasmic vacuoles can serve as a critical clue with which to distinguish SPN from PEN in diagnostically challenging cases.

摘要

背景

实性假乳头状肿瘤(SPN)和胰腺内分泌肿瘤(PEN)是具有特征性细胞学特征的罕见肿瘤。还已知这两种肿瘤可能有相似的形态学改变。这些特征常常给毫无防备的细胞病理学家带来重大诊断挑战。在本研究中,作者报告称,在SPN的内镜超声引导下细针穿刺(EUS-FNA)样本中识别出清晰的胞质空泡是一个有用线索,可将该肿瘤与PEN区分开来。

方法

评估了5例SPN和20例PEN病例的细胞学特征。检查了这些病例的Diff-Quik染色和巴氏染色。进行概率的Fisher精确检验以确定这两种肿瘤类型中所观察到的个体细胞学特征的差异。

结果

结果表明,假乳头状结构(P = 0.004)、异染性基质物质(P = 0.004)、核膜不规则(P = 0.004)以及大的、清晰的胞质空泡(P = 0.001)在SPN中出现的频率显著更高。作者还证明,当涂片中假乳头状结构较少时,大的、清晰的胞质空泡可作为怀疑SPN而非PEN的有力细胞学线索。然而,大的、清晰的胞质空泡仅在Diff-Quik染色涂片中观察到,而在巴氏染色涂片中未观察到。

结论

本研究结果强调,在诊断具有挑战性的病例中,大的、清晰的胞质空泡可作为区分SPN与PEN的关键线索。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验